SB Nation Atlanta Editor's Pick
Is West Virginia the SEC's Number 14? Missouri 15? FSU 16?
UPDATE: 09/06/11
If we are to believe Mr. Dodds' tweet of CBS Sports then the SEC is down to two choices. Missouri and West Virginia. I'm not going to speculate as to which one of the two will actually get the 14th slot as Missouri's position has definitely become more fluid since I originally made my argument for West Virginia. I will say that the fact they are one of the final two legitimizes my original argument. Further, while Missouri definitely has more eyeballs and a better academic profile, they also bring a few unintended consequences as the 14th member. First, it requires the movement of one western division member to the east (probably Auburn). That leads to A: the loss of the Alabama-Tennessee yearly rivalry; B: opens the possibility of Alabama-Auburn meeting in the Iron Bowl and then the next week in the SEC Championship Game. I don't think either school would look forward to that possibilty, especially after the Iron Bowl has been dubbed the most "poisonous" rivalry in college football by GQ. I live here, I'm not sure the state could handle a rematch without rioting and looting. C.-It also really throws the power balance between the divisions off. The last 6 SEC teams to win the conference were Auburn, Alabama, LSU (West) and Florida, Georgia, Tennessee (East). Pretty much even at three per division. Five of those conference champions also took home National Championships as well. It seems a little unfair to move Auburn east and replace them with Missouri. Tilts the balance of power back eastward. And second, if you read Missouri's SBNation site or look at any of their message boards they're still not clamouring to join the SEC. All the talk is about whether the B1G expands if the PAC and SEC do and could Missouri get an invite should the B1G expand. Check out the writer with ChuckOlivier.net who just visited Missouri. He is an Aubie (I won't hold that against him)- but look at how he explains the response to his visit to College Station vs. his visit to Columbia. Missouri may wind up with a spot in the SEC but a lack of fit seems evident.
Why it may all work out? Good question. If the PAC is going to 16 via the we'll take the Oklahoma schools now and then throw Texas Tech a lifeline for admission attached to the Longhorns eating crow and following them route then the SEC is definitely going to 16 as well. Slive is not going to sit and watch a conference so weak that the best they have to offer this year (Oregon) winds up with an even larger financial edge over the SEC (who happens to hold the team that beat Oregon for the NC last year and opened the season destroying Oregon (LSU) with a good chunk of starters suspended and also has the last 5 NC winners). Further, ESPN and CBS have both acknowledged that going to 16 means the SEC can tear up their current contracts and start over.
So, while I argued prior that the SEC didn't want to be the first conference to 16, technically it still wouldn't be. The PAC would probably beat the SEC to that number by a few months. But, if the SEC can add Texas A&M, Missouri, West Virginia, and FSU, then I think Slive goes for it. The gentleman's agreement will be, as Tony Barnhart put it, all bets off. FSU brings enough national viewership to increase the pie. Why did I plug them in here rather than Virginia Tech? Because FSU has been extremely quiet in their denials. They haven't pasted the number of denials regarding EVER being interested that Va. Tech, or NC State have. Further, if you look at the news regarding FSU, there are alot of empty seats at Doak-Campbell Stadium. Like 10 to 12,000 on average, (the exceptions this year-Oklahoma and Miami). This is a top 10 ranked team folks, and they aren't filling up an 88K seat stadium. That isn't a problem in the SEC and certainly wouldn't be a problem if GA, FL, SC, TN, KY, etc were on the home schedule.
Let the controversy begin.
Ed: Bumped from FanPosts]
Let me start by saying that I am not a Mountaineer fan, but I am a Crimson Tide fan and an SEC fan in general. I inform you of that so there is no chance of my being called a "homer" looking for an invitation to the SEC. I am a "homer" of the SEC and believe that West Virginia is the right fit at the right time to request an invitation to join the conference. That being stated let's go over why I think West Virginia is the probable 14th member of the SEC.
1. While everyone is talking about Missouri, most of us in SEC country feel that Missouri wouldn't accept an SEC invitation unless the BIG 12 completely collapses. They want to be a B1G member and will sit tight with the BIG 12 until that invitation arrives. Like after the SEC has proven that a 14 team conference will work.
2. Yes, there is a gentleman's agreement in place in the SEC regarding in state schools of current members but it isn't Florida that will have to lead the NO charge on FSU. They won't have to. It takes a minimum of 9 yes votes to extend an invitation and FSU won't get them. Alabama, Auburn, and Georgia will vote NO. Add the gentleman's agreement of Florida, South Carolina, and Kentucky and you have 6 of 12 members that don't want the Seminoles in the League. Plus FSU is the ACC's show pony and Slive isn't going to take that from Swofford.
3. The other logical geographical fits have the same problem as above, except they wouldn't be as well received financially as FSU. Clemson, Ga. Tech, and Louisville are all straight up money leeches. They bring NO new revenue to the conference and would be pulling dollars from existing members. Ain't gonna happen.
4. While Slive's dream team involves North Carolina & Duke or Virginia and Va. Tech, neither can be split to invite just one. If the SEC isn't willing to go a season with 13 teams then they certainly aren't going to go to 15. Plus, the SEC doesn't want to be the first conference to 16 teams. We pioneered 12, and now 14, let someone else figure out the 16 team super conference successfully. (Yes I know the WAC did it, that's why I said SUCCESSFULLY.)
5. West Virginia is the only team left that makes any sense. Let me break it down for you.
A. You are a large state university, undergrad enrollment of over 22K with an endowment over 400 million, with no political complications to slow things down for acceptance by 2012. (Last I heard your buyout from the Big East was around 8 million, about 1/3rd of your TV contract for one year in the SEC.)
B. You are a bunch of couch burning crazies who travel great and while your stadium is a little on the small side for the SEC (avg attendance over 56K) it is in the range of Ole Miss and Miss State and is full on game day. Plus with all this new money you can expand at will.
C. You have proven you can be more than competitive in the SEC east, especially in football. You beat Georgia in the Sugar, you beat Miss State in home and home series, split with Auburn and gave LSU a hell of a game last year and they're coming to your place this year. Your Basketball program is top notch and the SEC did a way with divisions in basketball starting this year thanks to my Tide (West champs with wins over Tennessee, Kentucky, and Georgia twice, who all made the tourney, and we still got snubbed for the tourney with the 2nd best conference record). There is value to both of us in this area (you and the SEC). And Luck is your AD and he is a smart man.
D. You bring currently untapped television markets to the table. Yes everyone knows West Virginia is a small state, but you are technically part of the Pittsburgh, PA media market (according to expanded Nielson) and they are the #23 market in the country. That's only two slots down from St. Louis, which is why everyone just loves the idea of Missouri to the SEC. You also put the SEC into Western PA, Southern Ohio, Northern Virginia and did I mention that you dominate the state of WV. You are the most valuable team to the Big East, you're the Texas of the BIG EAST, your just not getting paid for it. Further, you provide the SEC with a buffer to the B1G (whatever the hell that's supposed to stand for.)
E. You keep the divisions balanced for the time being while leaving room, should the 16-team Super Conferences come into being for Slive to approach the UNC/ Duke package or the Va/Va. Tech package, which allows the SEC to move Vandy to the Western DIvision. This cleans up the time zone issues as Vandy is the only Eastern team in the Central Time Zone. All the West would then be central and all the east, eastern.
F. You've been a big tease for over 20 years. In 1990, when the SEC under Kramer looked to move to 12 teams you gave the SEC a booty call. You did it again in 2010. The timing, like with A&M, just never seemed to come together. The public report of team evaluations done in 1990 had you as the team should South Carolina decline and rejoin the ACC. It's actually in print so google it. If South Carolina had passed then you'd have been in the SEC for more than 20 years now. I think the SEC takes you up on your booty call this time.
G. Academics, the problem every time WVU gets brought up. I have been told, but need some of you fans to verify it, that as of the 2011-12 rankings you've been classified as a Tier I university. That is the same as most of the SEC. Further, your medical school is now top 50 and your law school top 75. If that is correct then it is no longer an issue.
The tweet from someone in your athletic department about moving from the Big East led all of you to believe that the SEC was going to take an ACC team and that you were going to get an ACC slot. I believe you're not going to get an ACC slot, your going to go after the SEC slot and that nothing is there to prevent you from taking it. Tell me how you, as fans, feel. It took A&M almost two years to untangle themselves from the Big 12 just ot request the forthcoming invitation, how long will it take you to untangle yourselves from the Big East?
A FanPost gives the opinion of the fan who writes it and that fan only. That doesn't give the opinion more or less weight than any other opinion on this blog, but the post does not necessarily reflect the view of TSK's writers.
126 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
fyi
Tier one status is not a big deal. Every sec school is tier 1. If you go by US News and World report rankings (and that’s really all we have) they would be 14 in the expanded 14 team conference. I’m not saying they’re a bad school, but they would definitely be at the bottom or near the bottom in academic prestige, entrance requirements, and endowment.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 15, 2025 11:16 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Plus
How do we let Yankees by blood AND choice join the pride of the Southland? They can’t leave and then get an invitation back to “southern” status.
DawgSports/Falcaholic/Talkin' Chop
by blackertai on Aug 15, 2025 11:35 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Kentucky
kinda kills that argument.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 15, 2025 11:37 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
just not knowing what you want to do
and out and out leaving the Confederacy are different. the place to bring up Kentucky is when people try to make the non-Confederate argument against MIssouri.
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Aug 15, 2025 11:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Cleary we should kick the University of Tennessee out of the SEC
Becasue “nearly 70% of East Tennesseans voted against the Ordinance of Secession”
by RjTheMetalhead on Aug 16, 2025 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions
so remind me of the part where that meant they didn't secede?
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Aug 16, 2025 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Well actually....
the US govt kept the state government of Kentucky from seceding by essentially enacting martial law there. Many people from Kentucky fought for the Confederacy and that’s true with Missouri as well.
But honestly none of this matters. This isn’t 1860 and most of the people in SEC states wouldn’t vote for secession now either.
I think it’s interesting though that people from West Virginia are probably more culturally Southern than anything else. They don’t fit in with Big 10 schools or other Big East schools.
by AllTideUp on Aug 16, 2025 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions
Definitely culturally southern
And I’m from the north-central (read: between Pittsburgh and Maryland) part of the state.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
by TheMattROb on Aug 16, 2025 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions
“The Southern United States as defined by the United States Census Bureau.”

by RjTheMetalhead on Aug 16, 2025 12:00 AM EDT up reply actions
That....
Dover market would be awesome! lol
by AllTideUp on Aug 16, 2025 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions
St Louis and Cincinnati are more Southern than Washington D.C.
census bureau be damned
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Aug 16, 2025 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions
Southern Ohio is a werid place.
Never have I seen so many rednecks, and I come from NASCAR land NC.
by RjTheMetalhead on Aug 16, 2025 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions
It was mostly a joke.
I don’t particularly want WVU in the league, but I was throwing out that irrational reason for why they shouldn’t join like 90% of people do for all the other teams who’ve been mentioned. Why not WEST BY GOD VIRGINIA?
DawgSports/Falcaholic/Talkin' Chop
by blackertai on Aug 16, 2025 8:40 AM EDT up reply actions
apart from the irrational (but still sometimes compelling) historical reason
I think academics is about the only argument left. Well, that and that I have no idea how good of a foothold they can give you in the Pittsburgh market. I imagine VT does DC and NC St does Charlotte as well as WVU does Pitt.
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Aug 16, 2025 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd say WVU is more firmly in Pittsburgh than VTech is in DC
because they’d still have the annual rivalry against Pitt, and Pitt (and Baltimore and DC) is a definite destination for WVU grads.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
by TheMattROb on Aug 16, 2025 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions
If we cared what the US government thought,
we wouldn’t be having this conversation in the first place.
"Lattimore, as the kids can say, can ball, and sometimes does it to the extent one might say [he] is out of control in his balling." - Spencer Hall
by GwinnettGamecock on Aug 16, 2025 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I disagree, all the points above are far more important than that...
one way to look at if you feel that way, is that we are getting our land back.
"Fast Eddie: No bar?
Cashier: No bar, no pinball machines, no bowling alleys, just pool... nothing else. This is Ames, mister."
From the movie--The Hustler
GET TO THE RIM HEAT (and SKY)! ATTACK THE PAINT!
by mjtig on Aug 16, 2025 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions
I doubt Missouri would pass an invite from the SEC
They have no idea if a Big10 invite will ever come and it’s not like they are a better fit to that conference than the SEC. Fact is the only thing they really want is out of the Big12. Not that I think the SEC should invited Missouri, in fact I don’t but for other reasons. Nice write up.
by ev on Aug 15, 2025 11:39 PM EDT reply actions
I agree
lots of huge assumptions in that post, and this one is one of the biggest.
by LSUJOSHUA on Aug 16, 2025 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions
Let me explain my reasoning on that
If Missouri has to go the same route as A&M to escape the BIG 12, and I believe they would have to, then the BIG 12 collapses the same day Missouri announces they’re leaving. The B1G would then look seriously at adding Missouri bc they represent too many TV sets for the B1G network. Then MO has a choice of B1G and SEC and I believe they would go B1G to rejoin Nebraska and bc the educators- even the governor- love that AAU academic label which MO already has but will be able to fully leverage. Or worse, MO states they’re leaving the BIG12 and joins the SEC and then the B1G, rebuffed once more by Notre Dame, turns to Rutgers and Missouri to go to 14. I believe MO would leave the SEC to join the B1G if that invitation were to arrive and I don’t think the SEC wants to risk looking like the league that decimated the BIG12 and have the pulled linchpin then leave the SEC for the B1G.
by alduck on Aug 16, 2025 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree, MU would prefer to join the Big10
they made that clear last year. However it’s still an assumption the Big10 wants them, they have only talked about looking east for their next round of expansion. I don’t think the Big10 is in any hurry to expand again, of all the conferences they can afford to wait the most (and when they do it will be to 16, no stopping at 14). I just don’t think MU can afford to pass an SEC offer by and don’t think they would.
by ev on Aug 16, 2025 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions
Definitely
They will wait till 16.
Brantley Watch. The mood is tense; I have been on some serious, serious reports but nothing quite like this. I uh... Jon... John is inside right now. I tried to get an interview with him, but they said no, you can't do that he's a live Gator, he will literally rip your face off.
[to the Brantley] Hey, you're making me look stupid. Get out here, Brantley!
by ECFIVESTER on Aug 16, 2025 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions
I think the SEC does this as well.
If they don’t go after WVU and a couple of ACC teams then what’s to say that the league doesn’t cool it’s jets and take some time to see if they can hook the big fish that they might really want…UT, OU, OSU. If the B12 hurriedly replaces A&M with Rice, Houston, SMU, etc then it is likely a dead issue. But if they don’t, I think those schools might be willing to listen to an SEC proposal. Texas, Oklahoma, plus the traditional SEC powers would instantly make themselves into the premier 16 team Power Conference. And I doubt any organizing of the rest of Div I could change that.
by Phocion on Aug 16, 2025 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions
I seriously doubt....
that Texas will ever be in the SEC, at least not in this generation. The SEC was interested in them last year, but they want no part of the SEC. They don’t consider our academics up to par. The SEC also won’t allow them to have the LHN.
They are far too arrogant over there to consider the SEC for several reasons. Maybe things will change in a few decades, but there’s no chance it will happen soon.
by AllTideUp on Aug 16, 2025 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Missouri knows that if you get into the Big Ten, you get into the CIC.
And they really, really want that.
My hatred for Purdue is so great that no mortal human can detect its existence.
by HawksNation on Aug 16, 2025 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions
This is perfect...
balanced divisions, and there will be no objections…
Yes, Tennessee and Kentucky would both likely object to Virginia Tech.
by Caban on Aug 16, 2025 2:39 AM EDT reply actions
I don't know
The author doesn’t point out that West Virginia isn’t a recruiting hotspot, and they’re already taking the leftovers from SEC states to round out their roster. Giving them SEC status just lets to recruit better down here. I’d rather not cannibalize our recruiting grounds if possible.
DawgSports/Falcaholic/Talkin' Chop
by blackertai on Aug 16, 2025 8:42 AM EDT up reply actions
good point, forgot that one
NC and VA are much better states to gain a foothold in
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Aug 16, 2025 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree but who is going to join.
That’s the point of the post. If you only care about getting into North Carolina then you’re going to have to pick up the phone and call ECU. It will take alot more than talk of a 16 team SEC to break up UNC, Duke, and NC State. It just isn’t going to happen. Further, I think we all can agree that Va Tech is probably the dream pick for just one team in the East. The problem is the amount of political clout and threatening that Virginia’s former governor and legislature used to get Va Tech into the ACC. They even went so far as to threaten to force VA to leave the ACC and join Va Tech in the Big East. Hence, Syracuse got left standing at the alter and Va Tech got the slot. After all that I just don’t see them allowing either team to jump conferences without taking the other. Guys, don’t think I’m advocating for WVU to get the slot. I just took a look at possible candidates on the map and instead of saying this one or that one is a better choice, I looked at what would impede or prevent inclusion. That’s how I came to the determination that WVU would probably get the 14th slot.
by alduck on Aug 16, 2025 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I obviously don't know for sure
but I wouldn’t put Virginia Tech and North Carolina State in the “pipe dream” category. I understand that UNC and Duke aren’t leaving each other, but I think it’s in NC State’s best interests to peace out (and the folks at the SBN NCSU blog agree). Both may have trouble with legislatures, and if they don’t come, WVU may be the next best thing, but I’m not counting them out right now.
Also, just randomly, living in the Research Triangle, it’s amazing how much ECU gear I see. Definitely don’t see that kind of Memphis gear in Knoxville.
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Aug 16, 2025 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions
That's for sure.
Was up in High Point and then down in Charlotte for work less than a few months ago and ECU gear was every where. I even did some checking to see if ECU might be a sleeper in this discussion that we were leaving out. ECU is the 3rd largest university in the state, it is a public land grant institution, it ranks high in academics and is the only university in the state that has a medical school, a vet school, a new dental school (opening next year) and every undergraduate program you can dream of. The stadium holds around 50K and the fans are awesome, the basketball and baseball facilities line up well with other SEC facilities. They were founded in something like 1909, so they’re not that much younger than other options. The only two real problems I found with them (and they’re big problems) is 1- I don’t think the SEC will pull a Non BCS member into the Conference. To go from Conference USA to the SEC could cause some of the athletes to suffer from PTS (hell, MI State’s quarterback is still waking up at midnight screaming UPSHAW and they were supposed to be tied for 1st in the B1G). The other problem was their endowment level. It was less than 1/4th the smallest endowment in the current SEC. As for NC State, I would love for them to be a member. Have several friends who are alums but I was told by most of them that they were not leaving UNC, period. If they’re starting to have a change of heart great I’m all for it. What’s the probability of them deciding to join, navigating the political hurdles and being ready for 2012 admittance though?
by alduck on Aug 16, 2025 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah, I don't know about the political issue
that’s why I just throw them out as someone we should call without really having a good concept of how realistic it is. I don’t think we should dismiss them out of hand though.
And I tend to agree that ECU would be a really interesting wild card choice, because they have a pretty good fan following and are in a talent-heavy state. But you’re right that nobody’s going to jump them from the CUSA to the SEC. But if we or the ACC were to nab WVU or ’Cuse, they might be a good addition to the Big East.
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Aug 16, 2025 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions
ECU has been trying to get into the Big East for a decade
We haven’t added them yet (and aren’t going to ever; if we were sufficiently pillaged that ECU was considered, there wouldn’t be a football conference left).
by drothgery on Aug 16, 2025 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions
I'll defer to your expertise
it just seems like they have a fan base out of proportion with the standard CUSA school (which I didn’t know until moving to North Carolina recently).
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Aug 16, 2025 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh they have a fanbase
What they don’t have is a TV market, or a basketball team (if you can bring TCU-level football team to the Big East, you can fail completely at basketball; with merely an ECU-level program… not so much; this is the Big East, after all). Also, ECU is apparently somewhat hard to get to (much like Morgantown, it’s an hour and a half from the nearest real airport). And no one believes NC can support 5 AQ conference programs; they really can’t support 4.
by drothgery on Aug 16, 2025 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions
well, based on the fan support I've seen since being here
they can take Wake’s spot.
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Aug 16, 2025 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions
I see your point....
but I think if you have fan support then you have TV markets. I forget what city ECU is in, Wilmington is it? Anyway, whatever city they are in is probably no smaller than College Station, but university grads usually head for the larger cities within their state.
I remember watching an ECU game last season and was amazed that it held 50k people and it was also full for whatever average CUSA opponent was in town. I’m not sure, but what are the sizes of the other football stadiums in NC. I’m sure ECU’s stadium is bigger than Duke and WF’s stadiums, but I was under the impression that NC State and UNC’s stadiums weren’t that big either.
Perhaps, ECU would be willing to play some of their games in Charlotte’s stadium to attract attention in that market in exchange for entrance into the SEC? I’m sure they would do probably anything to get into a major conference.
Also, if ECU did enter the SEC then from an athletic standpoint they would immediately have a recruiting advantage over in-state players and anyone else considering the 4 NC schools. Not to mention, Duke and WF aren’t really cleaning it up when it comes to recruits anyway. They are kind of like Vandy. They happen to be in a Southern state, but they have to recruit nationally to find the kids that can meet the academic requirements.
by AllTideUp on Aug 16, 2025 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions
I think their stadium is about 10k smaller than NC State's and UNC's
and they are opening in Charlotte this year against South Carolina. Obviously, they’re not a school that’ll make the jump to the SEC, but they do have a noteworthy following for CUSA and they’d probably be my top choice if we decided to expand the SEC by inviting a non-AQ school (which we won’t).
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Aug 16, 2025 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Some conference should offer East Carolina for football and Duke for basketball
"Lattimore, as the kids can say, can ball, and sometimes does it to the extent one might say [he] is out of control in his balling." - Spencer Hall
by GwinnettGamecock on Aug 16, 2025 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions
The academic issue...
How good is ECU in academics? I know they are not an AAU school, but how do they compare to other SEC schools?
I’ve come to believe that the university presidents are looking for quality academics to bolster the conference’s reputation, but if ECU is no better than other SEC schools then I think that would eliminate them.
Also, I don’t think the competition aspect will matter. If ECU can bring TV sets within NC, recruits within NC, and a greater academic reputation then I don’t think the competition on the field will matter. Within a few years ECU would catch up, especially with in-state recruits, because of the SEC recruiting advantage.
by AllTideUp on Aug 16, 2025 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions
WVU may not be a recruiting hotspot, but they would get more PA recruits
if they get to say, “how’d you like to play away games in Florida in the winter if you play for us? Or you can enjoy sunny Minnesota and Michigan if you sign at Penn State?”
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
by TheMattROb on Aug 16, 2025 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions
wait, why would we object to VT?
I know they’re close-ish, but they’re not that close.
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Aug 16, 2025 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions
I will address that
Your right that West Virginia isnt a recruiting hotspot and they do seem to actively look for 3 star athletes in the south who’ve been snubbed by the SEC- Pat White from around Mobile is a perfect example. But look at where Alabama has started pulling 3 and 4 stars from- Ingram from MI, DePriest and Kelley from OH, Arie and Cyrus from MD. If WV had been in the SEC they would have had a much better chance of attracting those players bc they would have been much closer to home. The biggest thing is look at a map of the US and locate a large state university in an area that already borders the SEC outline but isnt in the SEC footprint. That only leaves you with Missouri or West Virginia. Slive doesn’t want to be viewed as a conference raider and Oklahoma publicly stated that if Missouri leaves the BIG 12 the conference would no longer be viable. That’s pretty much a warning to leave Missouri alone or be looked at as the cause of the BIG 12’s collapse. I think Tennessee and Kentucky would welcome West Virginia especially for the Basketball exposure. Also, West Virginia, like Texas A&M, meets the SEC criteria of adding football programs in the middle of the rankings. Your not bringing in a team that might jump up and win the division immediately but your not bringing in another team that’s only going to stay forever in the cellar of the division.
by alduck on Aug 16, 2025 9:13 AM EDT reply actions
I like the idea,
mainly because I have great friends who are huge WV fans whom I would love to see on road trips for games and for general trash talking purposes. Can I make a grammatical correction without seeming like a total jerk-weed?
Probably not. But I’m going anyway.
“Your” is a possessive pronoun that you use when indicating the property of others. Ex: That’s your opinion.
“You’re” is a contraction of the two words “you” and “are” indicating the subject of the sentence, you, and a state of being, “are”, which is a form of the verb, “to be”.
You use “your” instead of “you’re” both in this reply and in the article. (BTW - when has any SEC football program, besides Vandy, every cared about the academic status of their players beyond “passing”? - This is a rhetorical question.)
Now all should feel free to torch my comma usage skills in the previous sentences!
by HogInAiken on Aug 16, 2025 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions
I live in Virginia
and I can tell you that no one in the ACC is clamoring for WVU to join the ACC. The ACC looks down on WVU in a huge way, mostly because of a unfounded academic bias. Granted WVU is not Duke, but WVU is now on par with NC State or VT… it’s just in the state of West Virginia, a state that gets no respect. The SEC would be far more welcoming to WVU.
drinkin' fast and talkin' slow
by JMUDave on Aug 16, 2025 9:55 AM EDT reply actions
not true
You guys really need to do a little research on academics before you just assume things. NC State isn’t great, but they’re significantly better academically than WVU. VA Tech would be in the top 25% of the conference academically. WVU would be last. Of course this is all according to the ole US News & World Report. If there’s a counter argument, I’m open to it.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 16, 2025 10:06 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Not arguing the NC State is better academically than WVU
The point I was getting to on the academics front is that the SEC doesn’t want anymore universities who are labeled Tier III. Unless something has changed both of the Mississippi schools were labeled Tier III due to their lack of graduate research programs. It was the same problem that WVU was being labeled with, as well as Texas Tech. Texas Tech has very vocally announced their reclassification to a Tier I research university beginning in 2011-2012 and the Texas legislature has also made a big deal about the state now having 3 Tier I research Universities in the State. (UT and A&M being the other 2). I also don’t believe that WVU would be as good a get for the SEC as Missouri would be. But I do stand by my belief that it makes more sense for Missouri to hold in the BIG 12 until the B1G calls. Unless the SEC were to jump straight to 16 teams then Missouri can wait and watch bc there is still room in the SEC.
by alduck on Aug 16, 2025 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Keep in mind that US News & World Report lends more weight to undergraduate programs than most rankings
by alduck on Aug 16, 2025 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Like I said, I'm all ears
Yes. U.S. News and World Report has a flawed system. Yes, you shouldn’t use it solely when determining academic status. But like I said, no one is producing anything else backing up what they’re saying. As I said way up at the top, Tier one status is NOT a big deal for a flagship university. If you’re “Main State U” and you don’t have the resources to make Tier one status, then something is very wrong with your higher education system.
I’m not bashing schools that don’t have it, they may not have the resources to get there easily. So the University of Houston should take pride in the fact that they finally got there. What I’m saying is that I’m too lazy to look it up, but I would guess that 75% of all schools in a BCS conference are Tier One. It’s not something to shoot for, it’s a minimum standard academically. I’m not trying to keep WVU out, I’m just looking at the data. They would be at or near the bottom of the conference in US News ranking, endowment, and admissions standards. None of these things should be solely taken on it’s own, but together they equal a small drag on the academics of the SEC as a whole. Again, if there’s other data, I’m happy to look at it. But look for it. Everybody keeps throwing things around about academics based on assumption. VA Tech and WVU are both mountain schools, therefore they must be similar in academics or (not saying that’s your line of thinking above, but you got there somehow). WVU is further away from VA Tech than VA Tech is to UF and UGA (and Vandy if you go by US News rankings).
And academics do matter in this, that’s probably the biggest reason that OU wants to head to the Big 10 or PAC 12. The Big 10 has the CIC and that is a terrific resource for them. The presidents will add a school that’s the middle of the pack like NC State, but not someone that’s going to be at the bottom.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 16, 2025 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions
sorry, i got you and JMUDave mixed up
so that makes a little of the above misdirected, but most of it still holds.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 16, 2025 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Tier III vs Tier I
Every Conference other than the B1G has some Tier III Universities and they aren’t small schools. Just in the Pac12 Wa St, Or St and AZ St are Tier III. Granted AZ State is supposed to be moving up next year. But it would probably shock you at the number of Tier III schools. The big deal between Tier I and Tier III is research dollars, Research dollars are also want makes a university eligible for AAU membership. US News & World Report uses undergraduate as a main defining point, Tier III vs Tier I is strictly graduate programs and research dollars. The Big 12 has KSU, OSU, and Texas Tech (who won’t be officially Tier I until 2011-2012 fall semester.) While every conference has a few Tier III’s my point is they don’t want anymore. That is why WVU having finally made Tier I, if that is accurate, is a big deal. The only two Tier III in the SEC were the two MS schools and even though the SEC gets knocked on academics even it isn’t about to go along with adding another Tier III.
by alduck on Aug 16, 2025 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions
okay, lets back up
There is no official organization that grants these statuses. I’m sure what you said above is 100% correct according to the source you checked. But if you google “list of Tier one universities”, the internet basically says “lol wut”. There are lots of different academic organizations that people derive this status from. If you google “is Kansas State a Tier one university” you will get a range of websites telling you yes and no. I know the State of Texas has their own rankings for their schools. Houston has an excellent Tier One FAQ (http://www.uh.edu/about/tier-one/tier-one-faq/index.php), where they tell you about the various organizations that you can claim tier one status from, but if you go to these organizations and look for tiers, you get “lol wut”.
It’s a meaningless classification.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 16, 2025 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions
Actually the statuses are granted by your much mentioned US News & World Report
The top 120 Universities in the Nation are considered Tier I, then there is Tier II and Tier III. You have to actually pay for the consolidated list but you can find some of them at http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/col…ndex_brief.php
by alduck on Aug 16, 2025 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions
(sigh)
Your link doesn’t work so I don’t know what exactly you saw. I don’t know what US News (http://www.usnews.com/education/articles/2010/08/17/frequently-asked-questions-college-rankings) calls Tier I basically the top 75% in each category (not very selective) and any numbered university is considered Tier 1. WVU, way down at #176 is considered Tier 1 along with EVERY other school in a BCS conference and most in Non BCS conferences (http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities).
So to sum it up: WVU is Tier I according to US News and World Report. So are most schools that play IA football. If you don’t use US News it may or may not be.
The University I started for stray cats is now Tier I according to somebody somewhere. It’s a meaningless classification.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 16, 2025 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions
what is your hang up on this.
Either the SEC believes WVU is academically a Tier I or they don’t nothing we say is going to change that. At the same time you’ve spent the better part of today attacking the idea that WVU is a decent (I’m not saying great but at least in line with the MS schools who are the worst in the SEC) academic school. What exactly is your problem with the idea that they have been classified as Tier I by anybody. Are you a Marshall graduate or what?
by alduck on Aug 16, 2025 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions
hey brother
I’m just trying let you know why i don’t think it would be a good fit. If you don’t think academics matter, that’s one thing. But you can’t get this tier 1 thing. I don’t know how to explain it to you any better. I never said they weren’t tier 1. I just said tier 1 is no big deal. I’ve tried to explain what it is exactly, but you’re not listening so whatever dude.
If you want WVU in, more power to you. But don’t try to make them into a great get academically.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 16, 2025 9:33 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I haven't read any of those articles because none of those links worked for me....
but if the Tier 1 status comes down to the top 120 then that would also include a lot of small private universities. Several of them don’t play big time sports if they play sports at all. So the 120 figure would be large enough to include all the BCS schools, but wouldn’t necessarily include all the BCS schools.
Then again, I haven’t read the articles so what I said might not be valid.
by AllTideUp on Aug 16, 2025 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions
there are different organizations
that give a school a “tier one” rating. That’s important. The only people that talk about it are press releases from a university when they finally get it. Some organizations only have 50 tier one schools, some have 300. It is as meaningless as my father’s #1 Dad! hat I gave him for father’s day. It’s not about who is or who isn’t tier 1.
That being said, we are specifically talking about US News and World Report (sorry the links don’t work) because after it not being a good way to rank schools in earlier comments, it suddenly is a good way now. US News considers the top 75% of ALL the universities it evaluates, Tier 1. That’s over 200 schools. Yes all the bcs schools are in there (i may have missed one or two, but 98% of them are at least). There’s not as many private schools as you think because we have a misconception about private schools. Sure, there are a lot of excellent private colleges and the top of the rankings are filled with them. But half of all private universities are no better than a lot of state universities. The state schools often have a lot more money for research, etc. And that’s what a lot of rankings go by. Let’s say, for example, that you’re a billionaire and you found Saban University. You cap your enrollment at 100, and you pay for Nobel winners and pulitzer prize winners, the 30 best professors in the world teach at Saban. You will probably not be ranked. You don’t have many grants, your endowment is small, etc. So at the top of the rankings, its gonna be 2 to 1 private. But once you get past the first 50, the rankings are 2 to 1 public (maybe even 3 to 1).
But none of that’s important. Tier 1 is meaningless. Maybe even US News and world report is (although I think it has value). I’ve kinda blew my wad on this topic and become a WVU “hater” in all this unintentionally. If people have a good source or reason why I’m wrong about WVU’s academics, I’m open to it (they did below and made some good points). But this whole tier discussion is pointless. Northport Daycare center has just been awarded tier 1 by somebody.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 17, 2025 9:27 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Yeah...
The ACC will most certainly not go after WVU. Last time around they wanted Syracuse and I believe that is where they would look first if they needed to replace a team or if they wanted to try to go to 16.
by AllTideUp on Aug 16, 2025 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions
agreed
The Cuse is surely at the top of the ACC’s exigency list.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
by TheMattROb on Aug 16, 2025 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Who?
Who is the guy with Steve Spurrier? I recognize him, but can’t place him.
by AllTideUp on Aug 16, 2025 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions
RC Slocum of A&M;
coach before Fraudchione
by jagvocate on Aug 16, 2025 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah...
Over here we call him Franphoney.
RC Slocum never crossed my mind. I was thinking he was some official.
by AllTideUp on Aug 16, 2025 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions
TAMU and WVU
would be great add ins, if we can’t sway UNC to part from Duke. UNC is the obvious call girl here, and would make the SEC legit two sport conferences, actually 3 sports as TAMU and UNC are great baseball teams as well.
Brantley Watch. The mood is tense; I have been on some serious, serious reports but nothing quite like this. I uh... Jon... John is inside right now. I tried to get an interview with him, but they said no, you can't do that he's a live Gator, he will literally rip your face off.
[to the Brantley] Hey, you're making me look stupid. Get out here, Brantley!
by ECFIVESTER on Aug 16, 2025 11:56 AM EDT reply actions
The SEC won 9 of the last 22 College World Series
Including the last three. I don’t think we need TAMU or UNC for baseball legitimacy.
by danmarcel on Aug 16, 2025 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Not saying we would
but could imagine them included as well … we’d be even more so THE baseball conference. UNC and TAMU regularly go to Omaha.
Brantley Watch. The mood is tense; I have been on some serious, serious reports but nothing quite like this. I uh... Jon... John is inside right now. I tried to get an interview with him, but they said no, you can't do that he's a live Gator, he will literally rip your face off.
[to the Brantley] Hey, you're making me look stupid. Get out here, Brantley!
by ECFIVESTER on Aug 16, 2025 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions
UNC will not ever leave the ACC and Duke behind
I repeat, UNC will not ever leave the ACC and Duke behind.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
by TheMattROb on Aug 16, 2025 3:28 PM EDT reply actions
Over at the Smoking Musket, stoli8 posted this
but doesn’t have a TeamSpeedKills account, so he asked if someone would post it here. This is info on WVU’s academic profile:
“Someone should post this to Team Speed Kills…
WVU should be in the SEC, and would be a welcome addition based on the below:
WVU is classified as a Research University (High Research Activity) by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Twenty-five WVU students have received Rhodes Scholarships for study at Oxford; few public universities have produced more Rhodes Scholars than WVU.
WVU ranks nationally for prestigious scholarships – 25 Rhodes Scholars, 21 Truman Scholars, 33 Goldwater Scholars, two British Marshall Scholars, two Morris K. Udall Scholars, five USA Today All-USA College Academic First Team Members (and 11 academic team honorees), eight Boren Scholars, five Gilman Scholars, three Department of Homeland Security Scholars, two Fulbright Scholars, and one Jack Kent Cooke Foundation Graduate Scholar.
The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching recognized the scope and success of WVU’s impact by selecting the University for the Community Engagement Classification, putting WVU in the 6 percent of higher education institutions that Carnegie recognizes for engagement out of all U.S. institutions. It is the only institution in West Virginia the foundation recognizes for its community engagement.
WVU has earned the Carnegie Foundation’s Community Engagement Classification. Only 6% of all universities have.
WVU was ranked in the 2011 top 20 “Best Places to Work in Academia” by The Scientist magazine—1 of only 2 land-grant institutions and just 4 comprehensive universities in total made the list.
WVU has more Rhodes Scholars than any other Big East school.
The College of Law ranked 15th nationally in Best Law Schools in Public Interest in the Winter 2011 edition of Pre Law Magazine.
The College of Business and Economics has been ranked as number 90 in the Best Undergraduate Business Schools of 2011, in the Bloomberg Businessweek.
WVU’s combined varsity athletic teams have an academic progress rate score of 974. The APR is based on eligibility and retention of student-athletes over a four-year period. The NCAA average score is 970. WVU had six teams with perfect 1,000 scores: cross country, rifle, women’s soccer, rowing, men’s soccer, and tennis.
Interpol invited WVU to participate in its Forensic Science Symposium in Lyon, France, demonstrating the University’s reputation as a leader in the forensics industry.
WVU Healthcare was named one of the most digital hospitals in the nation by the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society.
The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching has honored 18 WVU faculty as West Virginia Professors of the Year.
In March 2011, a team of WVU chemistry researchers won first place at the Annual Society of Toxicology meeting in Washington, D.C. The team of faculty and students came in first out of 2,000 applicants.
USA Today’s Guide to Green Living included WVU’s green efforts in an article in the May 2011 issue. It noted the University’s efforts to compile a guide to courses that cover sustainability.
The Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department was ranked 22 by the National Science Foundation for R&D expenditures in fiscal year 2009.
WVU’s Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Design has been chosen as a Peace Corps Master’s International partner, and will participate in an innovative program that allows graduate students to pursue a master of science degree while also completing an international service internship with the Peace Corps.
The Daily Athenaeum was a third-place finalist in the National Society of Professional Journalists’ Best All-Around Daily Student Newspaper contest.
More than two dozen WVU graduate programs were ranked by U.S. News & World Report as among the best in the country: primary care, pharmacy, industrial and manufacturing engineering, rehabilitation counseling, and clinical psychology were among the top 50, with another twelve in the top 100.
WVU has made the most progress of any of the nation’s flagship universities in providing access for low-income and underrepresented minority students, according to a report from The Education Trust.
Morgantown has been listed as one of eight of “America’s Top College Football Towns” by Budget Travel.
The WVU School of Medicine has been recognized as the 7th-best school of medicine in the country for rural medicine, according to U.S. News & World Report’s 2012 edition of “America’s Best Graduate Schools.” It also placed in the top 50 for primary care.
The Sport Management Program in the College of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences was rated as one of the top 15 graduate programs in sport management by SportBiz magazine.
The School of Nursing’s online doctor of nursing practice program is one of only four in the country that is accredited. The School of Nursing’s master’s program – also an online program – recently was named one of the best graduate programs in the country by U.S. News & World Report magazine.
WVU’s Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Design has been chosen as a Peace Corps Master’s International partner, and will participate in an innovative program that allows graduate students to pursue a master of science degree while also completing an international service internship with the Peace Corps.
The Five Year Teacher Education Program received a Distinguished Program in Teacher Education Award from the National Association of Teacher Education.
In the American Institute for Economic Research’s 2009-2010 College Destinations Index, Morgantown placed 19th in the “college towns” category.
WVU finished 40th in the final 2011 Learfield Sports Directors’ Cup standings; the school has finished in the top 50 for four consecutive years.
The Big East Conference selected 158 WVU student-athletes as 2009-10 Big East Academic All-Stars.
The College of Engineering and Mineral Resources sent its first team to NASA’s lunabotics competition in 2011, and the team took third place in the mining division, among other honors. The 46 teams were tasked with designing and building a robot capable of working on the lunar surface.
Overall our sports programs would do quite well in the conference with both basketball teams already positioned to compete in the top 25% of the league. That goes for both Soccer teams, and swimming as well. Our Rifle team would bring a consistent opportunity for another SEC National Champion as well.
Add and post…I don’t have have an account that will let me post on Team Speedkills yet…"
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
by TheMattROb on Aug 16, 2025 4:04 PM EDT reply actions
Finally
Some actual facts. Your list of Rhodes Scholars is very impressive.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 16, 2025 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions
THANK YOU
I am so glad someone finally moved all this over. I have been arguing that it was a perception thing but didn’t have the facts above to back it up. Would love for some of those West Virginia fans to weigh in on this discussion as that’s whose opinions I’ve been watching for.
by alduck on Aug 16, 2025 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
To add to the reasons why we should add WVU to the SEC (and I agree with your post)...
any school with an SB site, The Smoking Musket is a great site btw, that does a weekly post like Hump Day goes up in value to any conference ;)
"Fast Eddie: No bar?
Cashier: No bar, no pinball machines, no bowling alleys, just pool... nothing else. This is Ames, mister."
From the movie--The Hustler
GET TO THE RIM HEAT (and SKY)! ATTACK THE PAINT!
by mjtig on Aug 16, 2025 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Also, WVU has an amazing stats site
showing records against every team they’ve ever played against in football and basketball. And its sortable.
wvustats.com
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
by TheMattROb on Aug 16, 2025 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions
From a WVU fan --
I just lot a long-ass post I had about this (Chrome!).
WVU lost many of its historic rivals thanks to conference realignment and independent schools joining conferences. Most of these rivals were in the northeast and mid-Atlantic regions.
It happens. JoePa and PSU will not schedule against WVU any more, despite the teams having played over 60 games against each other (and yeah, it was mostly a one-sided rivalry). VTech and WVU haven’t squared off since VTech bolted — and god do I hate VTech. Hate them more than Pitt or Maryland. At least Maryland is back on the schedule.
WVU doesn’t really fit in the Big East. They do in many ways, because they’ve played here since 1991. But if you’ve ever been to a WVU home game (and I assume most of you’ve not), you’ll see a riproaring crowd, a huge tailgating sprawl, and noise so loud opponents get delay of game penalties because the players can’t hear the quarterback.
This is commonplace in the SEC. It is not in the Big East. WVU, despite recruits that are secondhand from PA, MD, and OH, and thirdhand from FL, TX, and GA, wins a lot of games. They also win games despite an athletic budget significantly smaller than those in the Big 12, B1G, SEC, and most of the ACC.
They may struggle to build depth of talent like the SEC East squads all have, but they would get there. As soon as recruits see Florida and Georgia and SC on the schedule, rather than Cincy and South Florida and UConn, they’ll consider the Mountaineers a lot more. I think WVU’s recruiting profile in the northeast and mid-Atlantic would significantly increase without drawing away any prized recruits from territories currently spoken for by SEC teams.
I love seeing the Backyard Brawl, and as long as that, and occasional series against Syracuse and Maryland continue, I think an SEC schedule would be much more in line with WVU’s fanbase, its football mentality, and its quality of product.
In addition, I would just love the hell outta seeing Bob Huggins and Calipari and Billy Donovan fighting over basketball supremacy every year. It will sting to lose the Big East basketball schedule. But I think WVU would be a great addition to the SEC.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
by TheMattROb on Aug 16, 2025 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions
To Mr. Mandingo-
While I am trying to appreciate your position I simply haven’t figured out why you are so set on proving that WVU is a complete wasteland in academia. Nor have I attacked the idea, which you crudely insinuated, that the SEC doesn’t care about academics as long as their “players stay eligible.” You mentioned Cal and I believe they are a fine university yet then you say that they missing from the information posted by someone who obviously spent a great deal of time accumulating the information. Nobody is knocking Cal’s reputation, what we are saying is that, just as you’ve stated, there are numerous rating systems. However you’ve just confirmed that according to your research WVU is considered a Tier I University, along with your school for cats. Now, since I have just finished one Phd and am considering another, if you would be so kind as to tell me exactly what programs your school for stray cats offers in the doctorate program, I may have an interest.
by alduck on Aug 16, 2025 8:54 PM EDT reply actions
you must work in campaign politics
1. I was never set on proving that WVU is an academic wasteland. If they invented a cold fusion car engine that runs on good thoughts and expels happiness, fluffy bunnies, and mid east peace, I could not be happier for them or the world. What I originally said was that I didn’t think the SEC would go after WVU because of academics. Then, on this very page, you posted:
G. Academics, the problem every time WVU gets brought up. I have been told, but need some of you fans to verify it, that as of the 2011-12 rankings you’ve been classified as a Tier I university. That is the same as most of the SEC. Further, your medical school is now top 50 and your law school top 75. If that is correct then it is no longer an issue.
So I was “verifying” it for you by explaining why I thought that. Here is a paraphrased version of our conversation in the comments.
Me: Tier I doesn’t mean anything, look at other things.
You: Tier I is prestigious, the schools are proud of it so it must be.
Me: 98% of schools in BCS conf. are Tier I. Tiers are pointless. Give me some other data.
You: Every conference has some Tier II members. OSU, KSU, and TTech aren’t Tier I.
Me: There’s no “official tier I” status. According to some organizations, those schools are Tier I. Tiers are pointless.
You: HAHA! They come from your beloved US News. They’re not Tier I.
Me: Yes they are, look again. Tiers don’t matter.
You: Dude, why are you hung up on whether they’re tier I or not! Hater!
Me: (sigh)
2. The Cal thing. That was said on another site where they were implying that WVU was a better school than most SEC schools because of their number of Rhodes Scholars (which is an impressive number). I merely pointed out that if you go by that, then Cal is near the bottom and Michigan is middle of the pack. These are widely believed to be the top two public universities in the country so that’s not really a good indicator of academic prestige.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 17, 2025 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Mandingo....
I keep reading your name and thinking you are Mark Mangino the former Kansas coach…lol
by AllTideUp on Aug 16, 2025 9:54 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
seconded
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Aug 16, 2025 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions
It's even funnier
if you look up mandingo on Urban Dictionary.
by danmarcel on Aug 17, 2025 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions
Another Mountaineer fan chiming in...
My apologies for chiming in after the conversation seems to have died down, but I had to wait my 24 hours before being allowed to post. In any event…
Clearly, WVU would benefit from joining the SEC, and would jump on any chance to join, so I won’t discuss that aspect of it.
I’m also not going to argue academics, as that’s been done ad naseum. WVU is not Harvard, and no one argues that it is. But, I think the information posted above is good evidence that it is, at the very least, good enough for the SEC.
From the fan standpoint, we are DYING for a shot at the SEC. There is a good bit of controversy about whether we’d want to join the ACC if offered, especially since it’s looking like the new Big East deal will mean more money than the current ACC deal. However, no WVU fan in his or her right mind would think twice about joining the SEC.
A lot of us (whether we’ll admit it or not) have a bit of an inferiority complex… stems from the West Virginia stereotypes, I’m sure. There’s a burning need among WVU fans to prove that our teams can compete with the best. Most of us are realistic enough to know that we wouldn’t walk in and win the SEC, but nevertheless, we want that chance to compete.
We’re also sick of defending the conference. For several years, we’ve heard, “Other than WVU, the Big East just sucks…” Of course, then, we’ve underperformed the last 3 years and haven’t carried the conference the way we should’ve. When someone other than us makes a BCS bowl, we have to hear about the Big East not deserving the bid. (admittedly, UC and UConn were painful to watch the last couple years). But, it’d be nice to not have to worry about whether the rest of our conference is going to hold up their end of the bargain.
Finally, as for untangling ourselves from the Big East, the only number I’ve heard for the buyout is $8 million… chump change compared to the benefits of the move.
by MountaineerMojo on Aug 17, 2025 4:56 PM EDT reply actions
I'm still listening
It’s your opinion and the opinion of other WVU fans that will let others know if there is interest. I mainly wrote the piece because I kept coming back to WVU but nobody on any local or national talk show were mentioning you and i thought that was odd. So i literally sat down and started to work through every one of the so called dream adds to accompany Texas A&M. WVU was on my short list, (OF 5) and then i heard someone on Brando say that Clemson or Louisville might be the 14th just bc the market increase of adding A&M was so big that the SEC didn’t have to spend as much time worrying about the size of the market in added in the East. When I heard that I thought, well maybe it doesn’t have to be as big (what market is really as big as Texas) but I still believe the SEC would want to avoid overlap. I basically worked the thing as expansion via subtraction. It’s easy to say UNC would be great, VA TEch would be great, but they have baggage. And it’s baggage i don’t believe they could get rid of in one year. That only left me with MO and WV. Oklahoma then stated that if MO left the BIG 12 could no longer be a viable conference. That doesn’t mean that MO wouldn’t still leave but I think it definitely slows down the phone calls from potential suitors bc no one (other than maybe Larry Scott) wants to be seen as the guy who put the final nail in the Big 12’s coffin. So there sits West Virginia. The Big East, because of the addition of TCU, isn’t in danger of collapse if WVU leaves. There is no in state political wrangling to contend with, as long as you play Marshall, you could keep your end of year battle with Pitt, (the SEC would actually love for you to) bc of the exposure in that market. Anyway, I’ll monitor this link another day or so but bc of the silence coming out of WVU I was looking to get an idea of whether WVU even wanted to leave the BIG East and if they would be likely to pickup the phone and call SLIVE.
by alduck on Aug 17, 2025 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd definitely take WVU over Louisville
and quite possibly over Clemson, depending on how we’re all feeling about academic reputation (note I said “reputation,” not “quality”)
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Aug 18, 2025 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions
The silence stems from it taking 24hrs to be able to post.
I for one would love to get an invite from the SEC.
by TCfromDubVee on Aug 18, 2025 8:27 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I think it's likely...
…that Oliver Luck has had at least some form of conversation with Slive. I’m not an insider, and don’t claim to be, but Luck clearly has ambitions greater than the Big East for WVU, and ambition doesn’t get higher than wanting to join the SEC (at least, in football terms). If he hasn’t picked up the phone and called Slive, he’s not doing his job.
I understand that TV markets are a consideration… I just wish someone would actually consider ratings, because we’ll start looking a lot better. Half of the city of Louisville is UK fans. They don’t draw the crowds, and they don’t draw the viewership that WVU does. I suspect if you compare actual ratings for Missouri, Clemson and VT, WVU will come out looking pretty good there, also.
Finally, I wouldn’t worry too much about the state political wrangling. Senator (former governor) Manchin twisted our former AD’s arm long enough to get us to schedule Marshall. Doesn’t look like Luck is succombing to that pressure. Next year is the final game on the current contract, and it’s not been renewed as of now. I’d want to keep the series with Pitt, but most WVU fans have no interest in playing Marshall whatsoever.
by MountaineerMojo on Aug 18, 2025 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I have no inside information
but the way Ollie was talking on Sportsline last night…I’m past being concerned, but not yet excited for what he has in the works. He learned his lesson on keeping his cards close to his chest with Holgorsen last fall and I wouldn’t be surprised to hear big good news from him. SEC? Perhaps. I just know not to underestimate him at this point.
And yes, I am in the get “WVU to the SEC” camp
by WVUIE97 on Aug 18, 2025 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions
wvu has produced 20-plus rhodes scholars.....
and a bunch of fulbright scholars…..i would suggest that wvu has more rhodes scholars than most sec schools, maybe all of them other than vanderbilt, but maybe them, too…..
the reason why it gets hit on the us news rankings is that wvu has to by law accept more average students that most other state colleges…..and us news only ranks undergraduates, if i remember correctly, and therefore doesn’t take into consideration wvu’s fine medical, law and other post-graduate programs…..
i’m a longtime journalist and remember that us news’ high school rankings have come under fire for what some view as a faulty rating system, so it’s not much of a stretch to say it’s a little specious to base the whole academic rating thing vis-a-vis who is academically qualified to be in the sec based on one magazine’s rating system…..
i went to xavier, but i am a west virginian and a big wvu fan…..i am confident that the top academic dogs at wvu would more than hold their own with those at sec schools…..and wvu as a whole would as well…..especially if you consider the med and law schools…..
when you talk about the real creme de la creme, the rhodes scholars, et al, wvu pretty much tops all the sec schools….check it out…..wvu is in the top 10 or near it among public colleges that have produced the most rhodes scholars…..just sayin’…..
as for football, wvu is something like 7-3 its last 10 games against sec schools ….. so help me georgia and auburn ….. and very could be 8-2 if they don’t fumble on their own 10 against lsu last year or be dumb enough to kick a line drive punt to patterson…..overall wvu has a winning record against sec schools, i am fairly certain…..just sayin’ again…..don’t look down your noses at wvu…..
as for the yankee thing…..well…..wvu was on the winning side in the border battle that mattered the most….. ;) …..
by John W. on Aug 18, 2025 4:18 AM EDT reply actions
I agree with a lot of what you said
US News shouldn’t be the only thing we use to rank these schools. The problem is there’s not a whole lot of other options. People throw Rhodes Scholars out there, Cal must not be a very good school then. People tell me about how the US News rankings don’t count graduate programs. Maybe, but they have separate rankings for that. People tell me I’m not considering all of WVU’s fine graduate programs such as law, medicine, engineering, etc. Okay, but how do you know their so great? You’re right, WVU has a great primary care med school. It would be one of the top quarter of the SEC. I found that out from US News. If you google law school rankings, every website just regurgitates US News and World Report.
In the absence of other data, I’ll refer to the only useful data that I have. These are admissions standards, endowment, and outside rankings. And with the exception of your primary care medical school, you would rank in the bottom quarter of the SEC in your grad programs as far as I could discern it. If there’s a flaw in what I’ve looked at, by all means let me know. If there’s a great program you have that’s listed low, by all means come back and say “hey douchebag! The American Association of Engineering gave our engineering school a higher grade than any of your crappy schools!” (The sec has a few good engineering schools and a lot of mediocre to bad.) That’s something I can get down with.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 18, 2025 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't understand...
… the huge issue with academics. WVU has strengths and weaknesses, just like most schools, and just like ALL other schools in the SEC, with the possible exception of Vanderbilt.
Between the Rhodes Scholars, the med school, and the other accolades that were mentioned above, the point is that WVU would fit in with the SEC schools. Would we significantly enhance the academic footprint? No. WVU is not Harvard, and doesn’t claim to be. But would it weaken it? No, it wouldn’t.
Look at it this way: if you add both A&M and WVU, you are getting the academic prestige of A&M, which apparently is a member of the AAU that the Big 10 holds in such prestige, and you’re getting a school that, in most other ways, is arguably the best fit for the East division.
by MountaineerMojo on Aug 18, 2025 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions
would it weaken it significantly
no. But WVU would be 14th in a 14 team conference. Yes WVU is pretty much on par with Miss State. And Vandy rightly is an exception in this discussion. But you’re pretty far away from Bama and Auburn who are the 5 and 6 schools as well. And I’m not telling you that you shouldn’t be here. I’m telling you why I think you won’t be. If it were up to me on who I wanted in, it would be Southern Miss. But that ain’t never gonna happen and for many excellent reasons.
If you don’t think academics is that big a deal when it comes to expansion, that’s one thing. But until somebody gives me something to go on, I go with the data I have. WVU would be at the bottom and by definition, they would put a slight drag on the conference. Go find me some data that says otherwise and I’ll happily say I’m wrong and I can end this madness. Please.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 18, 2025 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions
So we are pretty much on par with Mississippi?
I think Academics ways heavily, but according to you we are on par with schools already in the conference. The fact that we are on par and getting better in a poor state says something. The facts above will go a long way when looked at by the appropriate parties if the SEC does send an invite.
by TCfromDubVee on Aug 18, 2025 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions
MS State
You may be right. I don’t know what’s going on in West Virginia as far as administration. They may see that the things that have held you back until now might be changing. I don’t know. If this is true, I’d love to know it.
Look, I’m a UGA grad, I’m very proud of this. We’re a good school these days. We’re ranked 56 in the oft discussed US News rankings. Only about 3 spots behind UF which puts us at third in the conference. But in the 80’s we were not a great school academically. But external factors like the continued growth of corporate ATL and the HOPE scholarship began to change that. So maybe forces that aren’t measurable like those for us, are at work for you. I don’t know. And if there are, I’m sure they will be noted. But if they think that WVU academics have pretty much stabilized then they won’t bite.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 18, 2025 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't think there is such a thing as stabilized
Either your gaining ground or losing ground. In WVU’s case I hope we continue to gain ground. Only time will tell what will happen with conferences in the next few years. I do know one thing though Oliver Luck is going to put us in the best position to better ourselves.
That and WVU will win a NT soon!
by TCfromDubVee on Aug 18, 2025 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
My comment...
… was meant to convey the message that, while WVU has its weaknesses academically, there are enough strengths there to justify its inclusion. If the SEC is looking ONLY to improve its academic standing, then I’m sure it’ll try to add A&M, Missouri, UNC and Duke. But if it wants the two best fits in terms of fanbases, new markets, TV viewers (actual ratings, not just Nielson markets), etc., then there’s a strong case that can be made that A&M and WVU are those two schools, and there are enough strengths in the Rhodes Scholars, Fulbright Scholars, med school rankings, etc., to justify adding WVU.
by MountaineerMojo on Aug 18, 2025 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions
It seems as if your argument is not with WVU (or its merits)
but with the rating system. If as you’ve said and as been stated ad nauseum that the US NEWS stats are flawed at best, then why would you hold them in such high regard? It seems as if you’re basing your argument on a system that clearly doesn’t look at the whole picture and when given a wider breadth of knowledge you point to the lack of a rating system that proves it.
I’m confused here.
Certainly, if you JUST look at US NEWS it doesn’t look good for WVU but that’s not the whole picture. If you look at Rhodes Scholars it looks great. If you JUST look at Rhodes Scholars it doesn’t give the whole picture. Why do you insist on having a US NEWS-like ranking system to determine your position? Obviously, there is not such thing so reasonable people have given you information that challenges the US NEWS rankings as well as your contempt for the Tier I ranking system. My guess is you’ve made your decision and there is no way that it will be changed short of Jesus Christ, or Vince Dooley, telling you other wise.
If you don’t think WVU should go to the SEC, fine, but when others disagree with you AND provide you the information you have requested don’t harp on them because it wasn’t it the right format. Please.
I will not revert to calling you a “douchebag” but will ask if you own any red pants with bulldogs on them? If so, I hope you wore them on January 2, 2026 while I screamed at the top of my lungs from the rafters of the Georgia Dome.
"Thus, it is with those nurtured in Appalachia—they leave, but they look back, remembering pleasant things. The land has claimed them, and its ties will not be severed." --Maurice Brooks
Dr. Charley West, Please don't block me if I have typos or poor grammar.
by Oregon Mountaineer on Aug 18, 2025 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions
nice one
I don’t bite on trolls. If you wanna tell me why I’m wrong and that WVU is the shiznit academically, then bring me facts that tell me I’m wrong. Don’t skim every other word I’ve written and misconstrue and miss the point. If you’re representative of WVU then that proves it. I don’t think you are though.
As far as the other, I’m not gonna offend WVU people anymore than I already have by ripping on WVU football. Lets just say I’m happy to be a Dawg fan.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 18, 2025 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions
SEE LOWER POST- ITS TIME FOR YOU TO SUPPORT YOUR ARGUMENT
by alduck on Aug 18, 2025 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions
thanks I saw it
I’m familiar with how you scroll down to see comments. I did screw up the reply though. Your bold caps unnerved me.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 18, 2025 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions
I never said that WVU is the "shiznit"
but you never said they weren’t. You’ve done research about rankings, reputation and qualifications, much more than I have. My issue at the moment (like others, see below) is that you have given no weight to arguments other than you’re own.
You have every right to disagree that WVU might not be a good fit for the SEC, but I guess what I would like for you to do is to acknowledge that the information that you have been asking for has been given to you. (aside from a mythical rating system outside USNEWS).
Also, as an alumni of WVU I may or may not represent them, but I do like to talk a little trash now and then. If that is off limits here then I apologize.
"Thus, it is with those nurtured in Appalachia—they leave, but they look back, remembering pleasant things. The land has claimed them, and its ties will not be severed." --Maurice Brooks
Dr. Charley West, Please don't block me if I have typos or poor grammar.
by Oregon Mountaineer on Aug 19, 2025 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions
nobody's given me an argument
except Rhodes Scholars. That’s it. And tiers. Every BCS school is a Tier I school. So yeah, I disagreed with those two things as a measure. But instead of looking it up on their own, everybody is just being lazy and not putting forth a counter argument. If you think Rhodes Scholars are a good indicator then make the case. Just don’t point at it and run.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 20, 2025 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions
There are facts above did you not read that?
by TCfromDubVee on Aug 20, 2025 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions
yes, but don't you think that a college that produced 25 rhodes scholars would have.....
something going for it on the academic front?…..it’s hard to conceive a school that is suggested would be in the lowest quadrant of the sec to be capable of producing 25 rhodes scholars…..
like i said, i’m a xavier (ohio) grad, and while xavier is considered a good school, i know that xavier has not produced 25 rhodes scholars…..knowing what i know professionally about the importance of not relying on one source in declaring something as fact or fiction, i suggest that your saying us news is the only source available does not make its findings more above reproach…..
of course, one could say that 25 rhodes scholars might be a deviation from the norm regarding wvu, but we know the criteria to accomplish a rhodes scholarship is pretty strict and time-honored…..more so, say, than us news’ college rankings….. ;) …….
btw, don’t know why i thought of this, but here is a classic sec-related line about one of the south’s great academic institutions from the late, great atlanta pundit, lewis grizzard…..
“the u.s. invaded grenada? …..so what?…..vanderbilt could beat grenada!….. ;)
by John W. on Aug 20, 2025 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions
If it's a good indicator
then how do you account for Cal and Michigan being so low? It’s an honest question. Is it because they’re not the academic institutions we all thought they were, probably not. That’s why I’m asking. I respect that you are at least being reasonable about this.
As far as US News goes, how do you determine whats a good school and a bad one? I’ve used endowment, admission standards, and US News ranking. I’ve looked for other things as well. That’s data you can read. I don’t know how many times i’ve said I’m open to looking at other stuff. No one has given me anything but Rhodes Scholars and tiers. I reserve the right to question the validity of those things just like others question US News. But no one has given me anything to counter endowment and admissions standards. For all you guys know I could have been lying the entire time and due to the fact that everybody is so set on just not listening, they haven’s done their own research. So I really can’t argue anymore. Everybody just discounts my arguments without having a counter arguments. But whatever.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 20, 2025 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions
West Virginia's future is the ACC
We need y’all to form the ACC North to play North Carolina, Virginia Tech and Maryland on a regular basis while we take on Georgia Tech, Miami and Clemson in the ACC South.
by CCDFSU07 on Aug 18, 2025 10:13 AM EDT reply actions
Unlikely
Unless the ACC wants to add at least 5 schools, or the Big East schools with better academics (by traditional measures) are raided by the Big Ten first, it’s extremely unlikely they’ll add WVU (or Louisville). Whether this is wise is another matter (though I’m not complaining about ACC snobbishness in the short run — it means that if the Big East doesn’t straighten things out and the SEC adds an ACC team, then the Orange will have a place to go).
by drothgery on Aug 18, 2025 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions
I hope not.
Besides playing VT, I see no other benefit in joining that conference.
by TCfromDubVee on Aug 18, 2025 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions
I have talked up WV up quite a bit on variouls boards.
The top 3 football revenues in the East not in the SEC are Clemson (no new markets), Virginia Tech (who said they aren’t interested) and WV all at around 30 million. It isn’t rocket surgery.
by Porcine on Aug 18, 2025 3:58 PM EDT reply actions
I think WVU would be a good addition....
I want to say first that I’m not agreeing with or disagreeing with anyone or any idea here. I’m just going to post my thoughts on the general subject…..
I’m not real sure why people are so concerned with academic reputation when it comes to what conference you’re in. After all, the only reason these conferences exist in the first place is for athletic purposes. There are such things as “academic conferences” such as in the case of the AAU so I don’t know why people wouldn’t be happy with those types of distinctions.
I have absolutely no idea what quality of school WVU is. You always hear talk of reputation and that’s mostly coming from the elitist snobs from the Big 10 and Pac 12, but it doesn’t seem there really exists a good way to give an accurate qualitative ranking to schools. So I’m not sure any of these reputations are valid whether they be good or bad. I keep hearing things that make me think WVU isn’t so great and other things that make me think they must be pretty good. A friend of mine made a comment the other day when we were discussing this and I think it’s probably valid, “that large state schools regardless of what state they are in are probably pretty good schools.” A big state school seems to be the focus of the resources and the brightest minds the state has to offer. Unless someone is one of these elitists that thinks people from Alabama or West Virginia or wherever are just dumber than everyone else and so their state schools must also be inferior then it stands to reason that a person can receive a good education at big state schools.
So anyway, I would like to have WVU in the SEC. I think they bring some good things to the table. West Virginia may not be a large state, but neither is Arkansas or Nebraska or several other states. West Virginia is like some of these small states in that they bring a dedicated population within that state. So maybe you get 1 million fans watching from the state of West Virginia and that might seem small compared to a larger state, but a lot of those larger states aren’t watching college football. Missouri, for example, might not get 1 million viewers for a game despite the state’s larger size. Missouri fans aren’t that passionate. They don’t care as much as people from states where there are no major sports teams.
I think I should be realistic though in that the people making these decisions are not Athletic Directors or even TV executives, but university presidents. And university presidents tend to be pencil necks. They worry about academic reputation and a whole host of other things that don’t really matter when it comes to what conference you are in. I know from first hand experience working at a university that administrative officials tend not to be down to earth people. They make careers out of maintaining or creating “reputations.”
If you want proof of that then just look at the NCAA handbook or in general how the NCAA operates. University presidents and other academic officials are the ones who make those rules, the ones who hold leadership positions within that organization, and the ones who run every aspect of that group. They don’t know the meaning of the word “practical” and they don’t care what you or I think unless we happen to be writing a big check…..
If the SEC presidents are as worried about adding to the academic standing of the conference as I think and as some outlets have stated then they will probably not add WVU. I love college sports, but I don’t usually love the people calling the shots.
by AllTideUp on Aug 19, 2025 3:49 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
this ^^^
"Thus, it is with those nurtured in Appalachia—they leave, but they look back, remembering pleasant things. The land has claimed them, and its ties will not be severed." --Maurice Brooks
Dr. Charley West, Please don't block me if I have typos or poor grammar.
by Oregon Mountaineer on Aug 19, 2025 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Several good points here...
Good post, AllTideUp. I can understand academics being a consideration to a point. But, they certainly shouldn’t be the main consideration.
We’re talking football here. Basketball and academics should be given some thought, but at the end of the day, any conference realignment is about football. Question number 1 is “Which schools will increase our football visibility the most, thus increasing the TV contract payout per school?” I think the answer to that question, in order, is probably: A&M, FSU, WVU/VT (probably pretty close). If the SEC isn’t going to add another Florida school, and VT wants to stay in the ACC, then you add A&M and WVU. (Assuming , of course, that you add anyone).
I said in another post that if Oliver Luck hadn’t called Mike Slive, he wasn’t doing his job. Similarly, if WVU is the available school which most increases the per-school payout, and the presidents refuse admission due to academic reputation, then they’re not doing their jobs properly. More money = better academic opportunity = higher academic rankings. The USNews rankings for Auburn, UGA, etc., are not going to fall because WVU is in the SEC.
by MountaineerMojo on Aug 19, 2025 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions
We already have the Florida market.
A common consensus is that Florida would try to block FSU. The one’s who should be blocking them are everyone else in the conference. Why would they empower FSU while adding nothing that would produce more TV money.
by Porcine on Aug 19, 2025 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah...
I think you touched on an important aspect here. I forgot to mention it in my post, but I was thinking about it today.
Let’s look at Vanderbilt: Vandy is pretty much recognized as one of the best schools in the country period. In fact, there are only a handful of BCS schools that rank above Vandy in the US News and World Report( i.e. Standford, Virginia, and maybe someone else)
Anyway, is Vandy’s academic reputation suffering because they are in the SEC? On what planet would we be if such things affected your academic credibility? It just makes absolutely no sense, but there again such things make a difference to pencil necks. They have their own brand of reality and they spend a good bit of time getting hyped up over trivial matters. I’m not saying academics are trivial matters because academics should be the chief concern of any university president. My point is, and I know this from personal experience, that these academic types are literally worried about trivial things.
The president of UA once sent over a guy to try to get a lady that needed to park in a handicapped space to move her car so his presidential motorcade or whatever the heck it was could take the convenient spot at a building where he was supposed to be appearing for some sort of VERY MINOR presentation. Decent parking is hard to come by on UA’s campus so it’s not easy for anyone to get a convenient spot for anything unless you just get lucky. Now take into account that this presentation was taking place in the library that was ACROSS THE STREET from where his office is in the main administration building. Are you kidding me? I’ve seen the guy jogging across campus so I know he’s not handicapped. Are you telling me the dude couldn’t just walk across our Quad and go right into the library from there? And let’s say for some reason he really did need a convenient spot, couldn’t you just get the flunky who’s been hassling this old lady to drop you off and pick you up when you’re done?
I worked in the same office as this old lady so this is how I heard the story. She was a little old school so as she told it she said some things to this flunky that I shouldn’t repeat. Anyway, you get the point. And our president is not alone in his lunacy. Most of these academic types are the same way There were other officials on campus that did stupid stuff like this as well on a regular basis.
by AllTideUp on Aug 20, 2025 4:08 AM EDT up reply actions
I've got an idea for Mark
Rather than continuing to ask everyone on this site to keep bringing you information for you to find fault with, why not you go get the information, other than US News & World Report which you use when it benefits you and discredit when it doesn’t, to invalidate the idea of WVU’s academics not being comparable to the rest of the SEC. ( You know the conference that according to you only cares about academics when it comes to keeping players eligible.) If adding Texas A&M is the highest of high then prove adding West Virginia is the lowest of low. But remember you can only compare them to viable bids to be extended and ACCEPTED. And you’ve only got one slot you can fill at this time, No UNC & DUKE arguments. It’s time for you to drop freshman debate strategy 101 and actually post the facts that support your argument. You’ve spent the last three days using the disagree with everything method. I think the WVU fans have made a valid argument regarding their academics. Now it’s time for you to actually back up your veto with some actually facts that aren’t interpretive. Yes, I’ve spent several years in politics and am familiar with the prove it argument for arguments sake. It might get you elected to the House of Representatives, but it won’t win you an argument among a host of WVU fans and graduates.
by alduck on Aug 18, 2025 6:17 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
No, I'm not gonna do that
If you’re too lazy to do your own research then I’ve got nothing more to say. The only quantitative data comparing schools that others have presented is Rhodes Scholars, which I said was impressive, but not a great determiner of academic reputation. If you wanna go argue that, go to the Cal blog. I’m sure they’d love to hear how poor they are.
I don’t need to look up anything else. I’ve tried to find everything I could, I looked up rankings (there’s basically just US News), I’ve looked up endowments, I’ve looked up entrance requirements, I’ve looked up the various graduate schools. I know more about WVU now than I know about any other school but my own. You’ve pretty much twisted or ignored everything I’ve said. I’ve learned a lot since this cluster f of a debate with you began, about schools I thought weren’t good but are, how they’re ranked, why they’re ranked, what the AAU really is, what the CIC is, how they operate, how Texas establishes tiers, how everybody else establishes tiers, what’s a good endowment, how endowment numbers can misrepresent, etc, etc, etc. So I’ve done the research beyond US News. Quit being lazy and do it yourself.
So sorry you’re so butthurt that I disagreed with your article. I’ll remember not to disagree in the future.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 18, 2025 7:01 PM EDT reply actions
For all that research you have done you haven't used it support your argument.
You have merely just disagreed. Which is fine with me you aren’t in any position to make any decisions.
by TCfromDubVee on Aug 20, 2025 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm not even agitated that you disagreed with the article
You simply never validate your argument with anything other than US News while decrying US News when it doesn’t support your argument. When you were offered other information from other sources you disagreed that it really mattered. The problem with the entire argument is that you don’t agree with any of the rankings offered but didn’t lay out a set of rankings anywhere that you did agree with. You required everyone else to prove their argument while refusing to validate your own. Even after stating that you’ve done the research and claiming that I was too lazy to, and stating that WVU would be in the bottom fourth of the conference, you didn’t actually post the information. That’s why you came across as a hater of WVU. Now I’ve got to go get a recently indicted but un-convicted state legislator re-elected- got the feeling it’ll be an easier job than this has been.
by alduck on Aug 19, 2025 9:38 PM EDT reply actions
what other sources dude
everybody gave me rhodes scholars, I gave you endowment, admissions standards, and US News ranking. Not to mention graduate school rankings and a full explanation of what it really means to be Tier I. You gave me rhodes scholars. I didn’t post the information because it’s easy for you to find. They don’t allow you to do slideshows here.
GO FIND SOMETHING. Everybody keeps saying I’ve shot down everything they’ve given me.
You gave me rhodes scholars. THATS IT.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 20, 2025 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions
I'll bite and repost
WVU is classified as a Research University (High Research Activity) by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Twenty-five WVU students have received Rhodes Scholarships for study at Oxford; few public universities have produced more Rhodes Scholars than WVU.
WVU ranks nationally for prestigious scholarships – 25 Rhodes Scholars, 21 Truman Scholars, 33 Goldwater Scholars, two British Marshall Scholars, two Morris K. Udall Scholars, five USA Today All-USA College Academic First Team Members (and 11 academic team honorees), eight Boren Scholars, five Gilman Scholars, three Department of Homeland Security Scholars, two Fulbright Scholars, and one Jack Kent Cooke Foundation Graduate Scholar.
The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching recognized the scope and success of WVU’s impact by selecting the University for the Community Engagement Classification, putting WVU in the 6 percent of higher education institutions that Carnegie recognizes for engagement out of all U.S. institutions. It is the only institution in West Virginia the foundation recognizes for its community engagement.
WVU has earned the Carnegie Foundation’s Community Engagement Classification. Only 6% of all universities have.
WVU was ranked in the 2011 top 20 "Best Places to Work in Academia" by The Scientist magazine—1 of only 2 land-grant institutions and just 4 comprehensive universities in total made the list.
WVU has more Rhodes Scholars than any other Big East school.
The College of Law ranked 15th nationally in Best Law Schools in Public Interest in the Winter 2011 edition of Pre Law Magazine.
The College of Business and Economics has been ranked as number 90 in the Best Undergraduate Business Schools of 2011, in the Bloomberg Businessweek.
WVU’s combined varsity athletic teams have an academic progress rate score of 974. The APR is based on eligibility and retention of student-athletes over a four-year period. The NCAA average score is 970. WVU had six teams with perfect 1,000 scores: cross country, rifle, women’s soccer, rowing, men’s soccer, and tennis.
Interpol invited WVU to participate in its Forensic Science Symposium in Lyon, France, demonstrating the University’s reputation as a leader in the forensics industry.
WVU Healthcare was named one of the most digital hospitals in the nation by the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society.
The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching has honored 18 WVU faculty as West Virginia Professors of the Year.
In March 2011, a team of WVU chemistry researchers won first place at the Annual Society of Toxicology meeting in Washington, D.C. The team of faculty and students came in first out of 2,000 applicants.
USA Today’s Guide to Green Living included WVU’s green efforts in an article in the May 2011 issue. It noted the University’s efforts to compile a guide to courses that cover sustainability.
The Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department was ranked 22 by the National Science Foundation for R&D expenditures in fiscal year 2009.
WVU’s Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Design has been chosen as a Peace Corps Master’s International partner, and will participate in an innovative program that allows graduate students to pursue a master of science degree while also completing an international service internship with the Peace Corps.
The Daily Athenaeum was a third-place finalist in the National Society of Professional Journalists’ Best All-Around Daily Student Newspaper contest.
More than two dozen WVU graduate programs were ranked by U.S. News & World Report as among the best in the country: primary care, pharmacy, industrial and manufacturing engineering, rehabilitation counseling, and clinical psychology were among the top 50, with another twelve in the top 100.
WVU has made the most progress of any of the nation’s flagship universities in providing access for low-income and underrepresented minority students, according to a report from The Education Trust.
Morgantown has been listed as one of eight of "America’s Top College Football Towns" by Budget Travel.
The WVU School of Medicine has been recognized as the 7th-best school of medicine in the country for rural medicine, according to U.S. News & World Report’s 2012 edition of "America’s Best Graduate Schools." It also placed in the top 50 for primary care.
The Sport Management Program in the College of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences was rated as one of the top 15 graduate programs in sport management by SportBiz magazine.
The School of Nursing’s online doctor of nursing practice program is one of only four in the country that is accredited. The School of Nursing’s master’s program – also an online program – recently was named one of the best graduate programs in the country by U.S. News & World Report magazine.
WVU’s Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Design has been chosen as a Peace Corps Master’s International partner, and will participate in an innovative program that allows graduate students to pursue a master of science degree while also completing an international service internship with the Peace Corps.
The Five Year Teacher Education Program received a Distinguished Program in Teacher Education Award from the National Association of Teacher Education.
In the American Institute for Economic Research’s 2009-2010 College Destinations Index, Morgantown placed 19th in the "college towns" category.
WVU finished 40th in the final 2011 Learfield Sports Directors’ Cup standings; the school has finished in the top 50 for four consecutive years.
The Big East Conference selected 158 WVU student-athletes as 2009-10 Big East Academic All-Stars.
The College of Engineering and Mineral Resources sent its first team to NASA’s lunabotics competition in 2011, and the team took third place in the mining division, among other honors. The 46 teams were tasked with designing and building a robot capable of working on the lunar surface.
Overall our sports programs would do quite well in the conference with both basketball teams already positioned to compete in the top 25% of the league. That goes for both Soccer teams, and swimming as well. Our Rifle team would bring a consistent opportunity for another SEC National Champion as well.
Add and post…I don’t have have an account that will let me post on Team Speedkills yet…"
by WVUIE97 on Aug 20, 2025 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions
I am not going to debate Missouri vs. WVU
Simply put, I think most WVU fans want to escape the Big East for a conference that takes football seriously and I think most Mizzou fans just want to escape the B12 for another AQ conference. As long as the B12 is still around (in current 10-team format), it probably offers the best chance for Mizzou to get to a BCS bowl, so that’s why they are still in it.
I will tell you that based upon the comments of fellow Mizzou grads, many of them are stuck in 80’s thinking. 80’s thinking, at Mizzou, was that they were the “Harvard of the Midwest” which stuck our school with high admission standards (thus the poor performance on the field, no emphasis on athletics). Simply put, although they enjoy the relative success of the football team, they feel academically and culturally linked to the B1G.
I think I speak for the 30% of Missouri fans that would love being part of the SEC. If you asked me if I would rather spend my Saturdays in November at the Grove or at Camp Randall, gee, do you really HAVE to ask? Plus, I think joining the SEC would force the school admin to realize they have to go “all-in” in terms of supporting the football team. I am not going to claim that Gary Pinkel is a great coach. But he’s pretty good (and he IS great at identifying talent for Mizzou’s system) and I would put Mizzou’s recent success up against anyone’s. Mizzou’s 5 year record and recent draft results kind of speak for themselves. This ‘rabid’ percentage of the fanbase would be ALL OVER the SEC move and it’s one that I hope (if the SEC moves to 16 teams) that is made.
I understand there’s a cultural debate, from both sides. I submit to you that after a few years, you’d never know the difference.
"When among evil companions, try to fit in." - Wild Bill Donovan
by Kpz1234 on Sep 9, 2025 5:47 PM EDT reply actions

by alduck on 









