Team Speed Kills: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: SBN St. Louis: Gateway to the Best in Sports

If expanding, 14 teams should be the goal, not 16


I think most people would agree that the 12 team, 2 division format has worked really well for the SEC.  I am of the opinion that 16 teams with 2 divisions of 8 stretches your inter-division and non-conference scheduling too thin.  With 6 team divisions you play 5 divisional games and 3 non-division games (2 rotating, one permanent).  That leaves you room for 4 non-conference games while playing against 73% of your conference.  The most infrequently you would play a non-divisional opponent is twice every 5 years. 

 

Now, if you have two 8 team divisions you are stuck playing seven divisional games.  Add a permanent opponent in the other division, and you're already at 8 conference games.  To match the two rotating inter-division games of the current system, you'd have to drop two non-conference games.  And that still leaves you at playing 66% of your conference.  You'd play certain teams twice every seven years. 

Limiting yourself to two OOC games as opposed to four is a big deal.  First of all, you're probably losing a home game, possibly two.  That's lost money.  Secondly, you're limiting your options for premier non-conference matchups which is a bummer for the fans.  You also lose the chance to schedule cupcakes.  These make your path to going undefeated easier, but they also provide important opportunities to give young players and backups experience. 

 

Expanding to 14 teams does stretch your schedule, but not as much as 16.  I think it's a better option for the SEC.  With the PAC-x and possibly the Big 10 moving to 16 teams, I don't think the SEC wants to stay at 12 simply because they would be seen as being surpassed, upstaged, and outdated.  But I don't think anyone will make an issue of 14 vs 16.  The other benefit of expansion is additional TV markets for more TV dollars, but you also have to divide the profits more ways.  Going for more quality in the schools we expand with rather than quantity will be a good move.

In the case of the PAC-16, the 8 team divisions will probably work out alright.  You basically have two separate divisions with little shared history/rivalry.  They can afford to forget a yearly interdivision game and probably don't care as much about how often you play teams from the other division.

A FanPost gives the opinion of the fan who writes it and that fan only. That doesn't give the opinion more or less weight than any other opinion on this blog, but the post does not necessarily reflect the view of TSK's writers.

0 recs  |  Comment 4 comments  |  Add comment

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Interesting...

What I’ve noticed more than anything is people don’t seem to care about scheduling at this point. You’re right to assume that the Pac-16 wouldn’t mind limited interaction between its two divisions, seeing as they have little to no shared history or hostility. That said, the Big Sixteen would have that problem and so would a 16-team SEC. It’ll be interesting to see how it’ll all play out, though. If they can lure Texas A&M, perhaps they’ll aim to extend the footprint elsewhere with additions like Virginia Tech, West Virginia, Maryland, Cincinnati, Missouri and/or the Kansas schools. Or perhaps they could stay within the footprint and add Clemson, Georgia Tech, Florida State, Miami and/or Louisville. The SEC certainly has options and it should follow the Pac and Bigs blindly.

MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!

by ejruiz on Jun 12, 2025 5:00 PM EDT reply actions  

I see A&M; and VT

everyone else mentioned in the expansion could be outta the picture

...in dixie land i'll take my stand to root for Atlanta

by southman on Jun 12, 2025 6:54 PM EDT reply actions  

problem is...

VT means UVA, and then you’d be stuck with an odd number again.

I wouldn’t be surprised if they took UNC, Maryland, or possibly Missouri (though the SEC seems uninterested in them right now).

by LSU FAN on Jun 13, 2025 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

UNC ain't leaving

if we get UVA we need to get a team from the west

...in dixie land i'll take my stand to root for Atlanta

by southman on Jun 13, 2025 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions  


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the SEC
Start posting on Team Speed Kills »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Myths that need to be killed before the next round of conference realignment talks...
Glowing_buddha_small
Why not Houston?
Script_small
If expanding, 14 teams should be the goal, not 16
Death-clutch-brock-lesnar-ufc100-tshirt_small
So what will happen when Boise State plays Ole Miss?
Col_reb_coffin_small
The SEC Empire: Why the SEC should take the lead, not the backseat on Expansion
SEC 2010 NFL Draft Report Card
Stuff_043_1__small
Why Alabama doesn't get any support from other teams' fans on this schedule thing.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

NCAA Football -- FanHouse

  • Utah Getting Its Pac-10 Invitation?
  • Dan Beebe: Texas, Texas A&M;, Oklahoma Will Get Bigger Slice of Exit Money
  • Pac-10's Scott Not Empty-Handed
  • Texas Eyes Longhorn TV Network

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Utah football players celebrate after a 37-27 victory over California in the Poinsettia Bowl NCAA college football game Wednesday, Dec. 23, 2009, in San Diego. (AP Photo/Denis Poroy) +5 updates

Conflicting Reports Surround Utah And Possible Invitation To Pac-10

+33 updates

Big 12 Survives: Texas, Oklahoma Agree To Remain In 10-Team Conference

Photo link

Winners And Losers Of Conference Realignment

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Gabalogo2_small cocknfire

Year2

Authors

14563741_small JCCW Jerry

Ff_130051_s_small froberts