Where Did Alabama's Power Rushing Game Go?
I'm not sure why, but something struck me about this year's Alabama team while watching its game against South Carolina that I didn't really realize before. Its traditional power rushing game has all but disappeared.
Oh, the Tide still ran the ball between the tackles with Mark Ingram and Trent Richardson. It's just that it largely came from the Wildcat or Pistol formations. Maybe Alabama just doesn't have a fullback it can trust (I don't know; can someone fill me in?), but the power I rushing attack that defined Alabama in 2008 and to a lesser extent last year is disappearing.
Overall, Alabama has been less prone to run this season compared to the last two despite having the best running back tandem in the country. The South Carolina game is an extreme example, as the box score quotes 35 passes to 29 runs (45.3% run). If you make all of Greg McElroy's carries passes to reflect the actual play calling, because I don't recall seeing a designed run for him, it becomes 52 pass to 17 run (24.6% run). Of course, Alabama trailed the whole game, and teams that are behind always throw it more.
However, look at the early season games. With only sacks adjusted to count as pass plays, Alabama's run percentage against San Jose State (48-3 win) was 57.7%, against Penn State (24-3 win) was 55.2%, and against Duke (62-13 win) was 54.1%. By comparison, Alabama ran the ball over 60% of the time over the last two seasons. In fact, here are the sack-adjusted run percentages for Alabama under Nick Saban so far:
- 2007: 465 run, 497 pass, 48.3% run
- 2008: 543 run, 359 pass, 60.2% run
- 2009: 581 run, 366 pass, 61.4% run
- 2010: 180 run, 192 pass, 48.4% run
As you can see, Alabama's run/pass balance is similar to what it was back in 2007. The crazy thing though is that Alabama is in far better shape than it was in 2007. That '07 team went 7-6 and trailed in a lot of games. This 2010 team has only been down more than two scores in one game and, it bears repeating, has the best running back tandem in the country.
So while things have been working well enough, Bama could easily be 4-2 right now if not for Ryan Mallett's generosity. I don't know if reinvesting in the run game will help the Tide straighten things out. I do know that the soul-crushing aspect of losing to Alabama used to be watching them line up and run over your defense for four to seven yards play after play. The Tide just doesn't come off as intimidating when you're watching McElroy throw a couple of picks like against Arkansas or run around for his life like against South Carolina.
Now that Alabama has lost and all the streaks have been broken, I wouldn't be surprised to see the offensive staff reevaluate things a bit. I also wouldn't be surprised to see Bama return to its roots and reinstall more of the power running game.
Tweet
4 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interesting stats...
…I agree that the coaches will probably do some tweeking. You got to think just lining up and running the variety of run plays Bama has, they can push over Ole Miss and a weak UT. That won’t work against LSU and won’t against AU unless they can get out in front of the Tigers early (ie. not a shootout).
Back to the bread and butter of Ingram and Richardson would be nice.
by Fla Tide on Oct 15, 2025 1:40 PM EDT reply actions
The goal under Saban has always been to have a roughly 50/50 mix of pass and run.
Of course, as soon as you build up a lead, you take the air out of the ball and keep it on the ground, which is why the run numbers are higher in 2008 and 2009.
by krnxprs on Oct 15, 2025 1:59 PM EDT reply actions
Also why the numbers were lower against SC you cant run the ball that much when you are down 21-3
"We just want to strike fear. In our mission statement, strike fear in those who attempt to bring us down." Greg McElroy
by The Voice of Reason on Oct 15, 2025 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Two things:
I said that. "Of course, Alabama trailed the whole game, and teams that are behind always throw it more."
Also, Bama’s mix was 27% run on drives when they trailed by less than two scores. The commitment to the run was lacking from the start.
Team Speed Kills -- SBNation's SEC Blog
If you're so inclined, follow me @Year2
by Year2 on Oct 15, 2025 9:05 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.

- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by Year2 on 











