Can Florida and Alabama meet three times this season?
The 2010 college football season could be one where there is no undefeated team from the Big 6 conferences. Florida and Alabama are figured to meet twice this year, once in the regular season and again in the SEC Championship Game (SECCG). But could they meet for a third time in Glendale for the National Championship (NC)?
Both teams have tough schedules facing them, Bama plays host to Penn State, goes to Arkansas, plays Florida at home and also travels to LSU. Florida has to play at Tennessee, at Bama and at Florida State. If the games in Tuscaloosa and the SECCG are epic battles and are split could the BCS computations work out to have them meet for a third time?
Before we can consider that, we must think of what has to happen beyond the SEC. Most of what follows is predicated on the fact that Florida and Alabama as one loss teams are better teams than any other one loss teams out there. Florida and Alabama play considerably tougher schedules than the teams mentioned after the jump and to me this bolsters there chance to meet for a third time.
Here is a scenario that could play to allow for Florida and Bama to play a third time this coming season. Virginia Tech has to beat Boise State on Labor Day, a one loss Broncos team will not make it to the NC. Virginia Tech must then lose at least one of its regular season games, Miami and Georgia Tech, or lose the ACCCG to a team with at least 2 losses, FSU could fit this bill if they lose to Oklahoma and UF. Ohio State needs to lose at least one game badly or 2 close games, Iowa, Miami and Penn St are all good candidates to make this happen. Iowa also needs to lose at least one game to a team that is not OSU, they travel to Arizona and will probably drop one in conference game. In the Big 12 Nebraska, Texas and Oklahoma all need to lose to each other (Neb and UT don't play each other this year) with the winner of the Big 12 CG having 2 losses. Nebraska has to play Texas and travel to Seattle to play the Huskies. Oklahoma plays Texas and hosts FSU and travels to play the Bearcats. Texas has to play the other two and hosts UCLA as their only decent out of conference game. I don't think the PAC-10 will field a contender this year given the chaos at Oregon and Boy Wonder being in charge of a penalized USC squad. The Big East will have Pittsburgh but I see them dropping the Thursday night game against Miami as well as at least one other one within conference play. The only other team that could spoil a third match up between Florida and Alabama is TCU. The Horned Frogs host Oregon State and BYU as the only two teams that could possibly beat them.
If, and obviously this is a big IF, Florida and Alabama only manage to have one loss apiece at 11:59pm December 4th would the BCS want to see them play a third time for the National Championship? If the first two games are hard fought with scores like 24-21 and 20-17 would Florida and Bama come out of the BCS rankings 1 & 2 if the only other one loss teams out there are TCU and BSU, my guess is yes they would.
This is an exciting year to be a college football fan as a whole. In my mind there is no clear front runner to make it through the season undefeated. Obviously a lot of people think Alabama is the team to do it and rightfully so but a lot of people said the same of Florida last year. Besides Florida gets to meet Bama in Tuscaloosa with the same mentality that Bama had when they showed up in Atlanta last year. This season also sets the stage for 2011 when Florida hosts Alabama and where most likely they'll meet in Atlanta for the 4th straight time.
A FanPost gives the opinion of the fan who writes it and that fan only. That doesn't give the opinion more or less weight than any other opinion on this blog, but the post does not necessarily reflect the view of TSK's writers.
Tweet
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Never happen...
No way both a 1 loss Bama/Florida would jump a one loss from another big conference.
It doesn’t matter how many football games the SEC wins. We will always look down on you.
by devidee33 on Jul 28, 2025 8:31 AM EDT reply actions
devidee's got a point
two teams from the same conference are never gonna meet in a NC unless a playoff is formed
Beware Newyorkers, Jason Heyward has arrived, he will rob A-rod of 100 homeruns, and will bring at least 5 world series trophies to the great city of Atlanta
by southman on Jul 28, 2025 11:20 AM EDT reply actions
Not when they've met during the season
If Penn St. and Wisconsin were to run the table this year, and there were no other undefeated teams, you could see two Big 10 teams playing for the MNC. Not going to happen, but it’s the one hypothetical that I could see working.
"Bama Hawkeye, you know, the Iowa blogger who actually uses reason and analysis." - Hawkeye State
by Bama Hawkeye on Jul 28, 2025 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree that most likely this would not happen
This is why I think it should be explicitly stated that only Conference Champions can meet for the NC. That way you don’t get what happened in 2003 when Oklahoma played for the NC after getting blown out in the Big XII title game.
So say Florida wins the SECCG game but lost to Bama back in October or vice versa and that is the only loss either team has and there are no other undefeated teams and all the other conference champs have two losses wouldn’t Florida and Bama be 1&2 in the BCS?
by brandond03 on Jul 28, 2025 12:58 PM EDT reply actions
In this case...
I think they would.
I thought you saying that two one-loss teams from the same conference would play each other over a one-loss team from another conference.
It doesn’t matter how many football games the SEC wins. We will always look down on you.
by devidee33 on Jul 28, 2025 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions
If the Champ of every other BCS conference has 2 losses
and there are no undefeated mid-majors, then yes, I suppose 1 loss Bama and 1 loss Florida could play a three game series next year.
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains
by Chekhov's Spread Gun Option on Jul 28, 2025 2:58 PM EDT reply actions
Never say never...
but this is on an order of probability somewhere well below 1%.
Would basically require everyone to have a 2007ish season, except Florida and Bama.
Talking 2-3 losses for everyone else.
by Caban on Jul 29, 2025 10:59 PM EDT reply actions
Sorry Florida fans.
The Gamecocks are taking the division this year. This whole article is a moot point.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 1, 2025 12:35 PM EDT reply actions
not while Myer is in Florida
right along with your idiotic panthers while Matty Ice in in the ATL
"JASON HEYWARD STRIKES AGAIN"
by southman on Aug 1, 2025 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Pfft.
Matt Moore has a better QB rating than Matt Ryan. I am not at all concerned about Ryan. Matty Ice is going to need a whole lot of ice after Norwood gets through with him. The only thing that concerns me about the Falcons is Turner. I think the Panthers and Falcons will split wins.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 2, 2025 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions
that's what you thought
we don’t freakin’ care about you right now what we care about is taking down new orleans and winning the division you will finish last
"JASON HEYWARD STRIKES AGAIN"
by southman on Aug 2, 2025 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions
The Saints rely too much on turnovers.
Without the balls flying and bouncing their way, their defense will be in the bottom half of the league like always. That’s why they were 8-8 in 2008. The Panthers were 8-8 in 2009 with Delhomme having a 50 something QB rating. With a serviceable to good QB, the Panthers are a juggernaut.
Whatifsports predicted the Falcons would have 6 wins lol. I don’t agree with it, but I found it entertaining.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 2, 2025 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree on the 'aints reliance but that's not the half of it
they mostly rely on the refs to make bad calls in their favor like what happened last year. whatifsports must be really stupid and have low amounts of viewers cuz I never heard of it
"JASON HEYWARD STRIKES AGAIN"
by southman on Aug 2, 2025 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions
You sure like to call people names.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 2, 2025 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions
what?
I’m not the only guy who does this everybody liked doing it at least once in their life
"JASON HEYWARD STRIKES AGAIN"
by southman on Aug 2, 2025 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions
hahaha
Oh wait, you’re serious? Let me laugh even harder
"You know, we had a lot of fun tonight. But there's nothing funny about vapor lock! It's the third most common cause of cars stalling. So please, take care of your car and get it checked!" -Joe Namath
by billycthulhu on Aug 2, 2025 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm serious only if Garcia doesn't mess it up.
I think the only thing that’s held the Gamecocks back for years has been the running game. Now that they have Lattimore to compliment the 2nd year guys, Miles and Giles, I think they have the final piece of the puzzle for a great season. They didn’t lose much to the draft, and have improved on talent overall from last year. They have some 5th year seniors. I think it’s now or never for Spurrier. This is their one single best chance at topping Florida for the division.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 2, 2025 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions
That's what makes a season fun.
I will never sell the OBC short. I will never bet against Urban Meyer and neither should you. Look at the bright side, it’s good stuff and after a whooping you can ease on down for a low country boil and a cocktail or two. If, by some fluke SC should win, I’ll just get drunk, run over my chickens, burn all my Spurrier posters and pass out under my truck. It’s all good.
by renegator on Aug 2, 2025 10:44 PM EDT reply actions
Why do you care?
Florida doesn’t win enough for your liking? Let another team win once in a while. Sometimes I wish USC was in another conference. Putting so many good teams in one conference is ridiculous. It makes all but two of them look like junk.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 3, 2025 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Not to knock SC as hard as this is going to look
but they do a good job of making themselves look like junk. I won’t call them good until they get more consistent. Talented? Absoletely.
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains
by Chekhov's Spread Gun Option on Aug 3, 2025 7:04 PM EDT up reply actions
They’re never going to be consistent, ‘cause they don’t have a winning history. They can’t get enough top recruits, even from their own state. The best USC can hope for in a conference this tough is one good year every few decades. Any other conference and they’d be plenty consistent.
I think college football is about as stupid a version of football as it gets. There’s an NFL draft for a reason. Allowing all the top college recruits to go to the same top schools every year is practically cheating. There’s really no other word for it. It’s a rigged sport, and it always will be. Congratulations Florida fans, you can win at a rigged sport. Wow, feel proud. Lmao.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 3, 2025 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Quite frankly, if any other SEC East team ever beats you guys, you should feel more shame and embarrassment than any other collective people in world history.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 3, 2025 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Rigged sport
Up until Coach Spurrier came back to UF, Florida had a history of underachieving. I’ve been watching this stuff for a good many years and only since 1990 have the Gators had much to crow about. It’s true that college programs feed on strength but there is too damn much taleent out there to claim that any team has a corner on the market. Anyone who says that SC has no chance against UF or any other team does not know anything about Mr. Spurrier. Do the circumstances seem unfair? Welcome to life. Adverse conditions make people become heroes. Keep the faith in your team and have patience. Your head coach brought us out of obscurity.
by renegator on Aug 3, 2025 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, wow.
Turning around the program of the flagship university of the 4th most populated state in America … I’m sure that was a huge challenge for him. Way to go Spurrier. Besides, you guys had plenty of 8 and 9 win seasons before then. Just the fact you consider that mediocrity only furthers my point.
And, don’t tell me there is plenty of talent out there. Pro teams are much closer in talent to each other than college teams, and there are some franchises like Detroit who can’t win to save their lives. Yeah, a team like USC has a lot of talent, but if 80% of the players on Florida’s team are just a bit better than their USC counterparts, that all adds up to a blowout pretty quickly. Coaching is not as big a factor as you make it out to be. If it were, USC would have had success with Lou Holtz, and would currently be having success with Spurrier. As it is, Spurrier has only been able to barely keep our heads above water.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 4, 2025 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions
I’d further add that quarterback is by far the most important position on a football team, and there are only so many quality QBs coming out of high school across the entire nation every year. When they’re quickly grabbed up by all the top programs, that leaves every other team at a huge disadvantage. At that point, it doesn’t matter how many top defensive backs or wide receivers USC can stockpile. Without a top QB, it becomes extremely difficult to win against a team, or several SEC teams, that do.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 4, 2025 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions
Uhhhh, let's not forget there is a big difference between college and the NFL
The big difference is one is a professional league where football is a job and one is COLLEGE. That means, in addition to playing ‘foosball’ the athletes are given the opportunity to get a free education and even graduate and earn a diploma so they can do something else after football! A draft for college is a ridiculous notion because you would be sending high school kids to lesser universities in order to level the playing field.
Clemson won a national title hailing from the Palmetto State - why can’t the ’Cocks?
by skigator93 on Aug 4, 2025 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions
I never said college should have a draft.
That would indeed by ridiculous. I don’t think there is any real fair way to do it. The best I can come up with is if a school already has a certain number of the projected top 150 recruits picked up, then they aren’t allowed to have any more. If another top 150 recruit wants to go there, then they shouldn’t be allowed to play football.
Dude, I don’t know how Clemson won that thing. I don’t know how they win as much as they do, or get the recruits they get. They’re stealing two of your Florida super running backs in 2011. How do they do that? No one knows how they do anything they do. They’re an anomaly.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 4, 2025 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions
The problem is that recruiting rankings are subjective
Some sites have the same player as a 4 star that another has as a 2 star.
Clemson won their title by recruiting some great players, running a great scheme and cheating a little bit (assuming this with Danny Ford on board and all!!)
by skigator93 on Aug 4, 2025 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions
Let me ask you this ...
How are those Jags, Dolphins, and Bucs doing? How are you going to have three pro teams and they all have losing records? Huh? Are you listening to what I’m saying? Debate over.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 3, 2025 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions
So the players that UF recruits (primarily from in-state) are too good, while the players chosen from around the nation by Florida’s professional franchises are inferior at that level of competition.
Do I have this right?
Also, there are too many good teams in this one conference, and all but 2 of them are junk. Explain!
by Redcoat on Aug 3, 2025 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions
What are you talking about?
I didn’t say all but 2 of the SEC teams are junk. I said putting all of those good teams in one conference makes all but 2 seem like junk, ‘cause they just beat up on each other and ruin each others’ records, and of course 1 or 2 will go on to dominate the pack.
Yes, your college recruits are too good, and your pro recruits stink, primarily because at the pro level you actually have to draft your players. You don’t get to cheat by recruiting whoever you want solely ‘cause of your school’s winning history. Although, three teams and all losing records is pretty awful. I mean, dang. That has to hurt.
Florida has the 4th largest population in the United States. It has 4.5 times the number of people of South Carolina. It has twice the number of people of Georgia. It has three times the number of people of Tennessee. So, don’t give me this junk about it being fair just ‘cause you people recruit mostly in state. Your state has a huge advantage from the start, which is only multiplied when you get big names from out of state due to your program’s history. It is a rigged sport, and you people should feel like crawling under a rock every time another SEC team gets a W off you. A 7 year old should be able to coach that team to a championship. But, when it gets to fair play at the pro level, well … we can see how Florida stacks up, can’t we?
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 3, 2025 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Population
Half the people in Florida are old folks and none of them can play college football.
Alabama is the 23rd most populous state in the nation, and has roughly the same number of people as South Carolina, yet they seem to do just fine on the gridiron. Nebraska has less than half the population of South Carolina and they have a fine tradition as well.
Stop making excuses and step it up. There is no rule that states South Caroina cannot recruit its entire team from the State of Florida or any other state for that matter.
by skigator93 on Aug 4, 2025 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions
Alabama has been winning national titles since the 1920’s. Don’t compare other states to them. Their winning history recruits itself.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 4, 2025 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions
You know as well as I do that the majority of the top talent goes to a select few elite college teams that end up winning year after year. Why try to make it out like it’s not a popularity contest? It’s clearly a rigged and unfair sport, and for one of you Florida fans to say USC makes itself look like junk just really got under my skin, ‘cause it’s not like we’re not trying. You all just have a massively unfair advantage. To brag about it like you all are actually accomplishing something by winning the SEC is laughable.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 4, 2025 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions
You're absolutely right
Everything you say makes perfect sense. Forget football, there’s always bingo, Tupperware parties, candle parties, feminine awareness nights, etc. You are female, right? Stop the f…ing whining. I can think of a lot of teams that have a lot less going for them than SC. Everything is cyclical. The sun don’t shine on the same dog’s ass every day. Wait your turn….quietly.
by renegator on Aug 4, 2025 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions
So I guess building a tradition is impossible?
Go look at the history books and tell me about all the SEC titles Florida won in their first 55 years in the conference. Then tell me about all the national titles we won in the first 90 years of playing football.
What? There weren’t any? Well, it’s a good thing that Spurrier, Foley and company aren’t quitters.
Army and Notre Dame have a long history of winning titles too - how come they aren’t getting the top recruits?!!
by skigator93 on Aug 4, 2025 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions
There are exceptions to every rule.
There’s no real point in listing a few anomalies to prove college sports aren’t rigged. I think the vast majority of people in the country would agree with me.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 5, 2025 5:46 AM EDT up reply actions
Rigged isn't really the proper term
Unfair? Sure. But “rigged” implies that there is some underhanded shenanigans going on that gives one team an unfair advantage.
It’s more like MLB, where the Yankees can spend more money than everyone else and just “recruit” the best players every year. But that doesn’t stop teams like the Angels and Marlins from winning titles from time to time.
by skigator93 on Aug 5, 2025 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions
Carolina has beaten Tampa Bay 11 out of the last 14 times.
That’s unfortunate.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 3, 2025 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Count how many rings those 3 teams have?
How many does the Panthers have?
"When you argue correctly, you're never wrong."-Nick Naylor
by Hook85 on Aug 7, 2025 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions
They've only been a team since 1995.
What do you want from them? They went to a Super Bowl already, and only lost by a field goal.
I would like to wholeheartedly apologize for the attitude though. That was uncalled for, and I am ashamed.
stuff 'bout stuff.
by silver82blade on Aug 10, 2025 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions
at least you didn't get crushed in the superbowl by Elway
"JASON HEYWARD STRIKES AGAIN" :Strongbad
by southman on Aug 11, 2025 8:24 AM EDT up reply actions
Sure you're not a Miami fan?
This elaborate scenario frequently suggests Miami take down a big team outside the SEC: VT, Pitt, and OSU specifically. If they pull off all those wins, they probably end up in the championship game.
Sure, they still have to put down Clemson, UNC, GT, FSU, South Florida (helluva schedule eh?) in addition, but those should be comparatively manageable.
I mean, Miami could still be hoping for a spot in the championship game even if they lose one, what with that schedule…
by Redcoat on Aug 3, 2025 3:24 PM EDT reply actions

by brandond03 on 









