Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dallas Cowboys Projects: Andre Holmes

Sprints Looks at the Economics of Realignment for FSU // 09.15.11

Why FSU might consider the SEC even if Texas joins the ACC
Here is a lesson in how the economics of conference realignment aren't always what you might think. If you look at the ACC contract, it might make more sense for the Seminoles to join the SEC instead. Why?

He said that FSU's share of the ACC television contract is between $13 and $14 million, compared to $24 million that each of the Pac-12 conference members receive.

I believe the $21 million for the SEC might be a year or two old, but it's the number that comes to mind -- let's use it for the sake of argument. Let's also go with the $14 million figure -- that would mean the average SEC team makes $7 million more than the average ACC team. That means for Texas to join and the ACC contract to catch up to the SEC on a per-team basis -- and we're going to assume for the moment that both are able to renegotiate the contract -- Texas would have to add $105 million to the value of the ACC contract ($7 million more for each current ACC team and $21 million for Texas itself). By contrast, Texas A&M has to only add $21 million for the contract for the SEC to stay at the same level. That's the economics of realignment that a lot of people don't see.

Now, I still think the chances that FSU joins the SEC are remote at best. But Texas moving to the ACC doesn't mean it won't happen.

Star-divide

Sharrif Floyd will play
Because he repayed the value of his impermissible benefits to a charity. Some charity, Will Muschamp doesn't know.

The Black Lung Bowl?
Friends of Coal -- yes, that's a real thing -- will sponsor the game between Kentucky and Louisville. How stereotype-affirming.

Vanderbilt agrees to play home-and-home ... with FCS team?
Okay, so that's not entirely true, since Massachusetts is headed to the FBS after this year. But still.

Nick Saban doesn't have time for this uniform ...
Not surprisingly, the Alabama head coach is not high on the idea of jazzing up the Tide's duds.

"I don't think the coach should change uniforms," he said. "I don't think the coach should change the color of the helmets. I just don't believe that. Now that doesn't mean that's wrong when somebody does that or they think they should do it or whatever."

Having seen the Alabama state flag, I'm not surprised that he doesn't want Nike getting any ideas.

You can do bloodwork on an eagle?
Spirit is day to day after his unfortunate run-in with a several-hundred-ton opponent.

"Even though they’re trained frequently during the week, when they’re out of the box they can make a decision on their own," Bellah said.

Are we sure his name isn't Brah?

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If FSU is smart then.....

they will want to get out of any conference that Texas is getting into. That’s especially true if they are allowed to keep the LHN as has been reported. The ACC is setting themselves up for a lot of trouble.

Texas is like an abusive drunk who is great looking and has plenty of money. He doesn’t have trouble finding a girl, but eventually the girl cuts her losses and dumps his sorry tail.

by AllTideUp on Sep 15, 2011 4:20 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Agree 100%

A school without football is in danger of deteriorating into a medieval study hall.
Vince Lombardi

by agulhas78 on Sep 15, 2011 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

that was a long time ago

The Texas schools also turned down the sec because Baylor and TTech also had to be part of the deal. UF has also won 3 national titles since then after doing nothing before ‘90. Plus they didn’t know the money that the seccg would bring in and the avalanche of money that would come into the sport. What they did then is largely irrelevant.

by Mark Mandingo on Sep 15, 2011 11:44 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I think there's one more thing worth nothing.

Even if Texas and maybe even a few other Big 12 schools like KU and MU go to the ACC then that is probably not a long term solution anyway. Texas does not want to be in the ACC and it appears the only reason they are considering it is because of the potential of keeping the LHN.

How are the other ACC schools going to feel in the long term if Texas has that type of advantage and they decide to let Texas broadcast conference games on that network? I don’t know if the ACC people are really thinking long term here or if they are just trying to increase their chances of surviving.

Not to mention, if the LHN doesn’t prove to be that profitable in a few years then it is quite likely that Texas will drop it and bolt to somewhere else to share in a bigger revenue pie in a conference they want to be in right now, such as the PAC 12.

by AllTideUp on Sep 15, 2011 6:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the SEC

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Gator-f__custom__small
FSU/Clemson to the Big 12 Rumors: Here's the Deal
Small
14 team Basketball Schedule
4c06a6adb42798a5c08d712c620047ec_small
Why Can't This Work

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Gabalogo2_small cocknfire

Gator-f__custom__small Year2

Authors

Kleph_logo_copy_small kleph