Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Shaq As Orlando Magic General Manager? Don't Bet On It

Sprints Analyzes Mike Slive's Comments on Realignment // 09.13.11

THE REALIGNMENT CAPERS

Speaking Slive-an
Before we actually go line-by-line through Mike Slive's statement on conference realignment, let's explain why it's important to go line-by-line through Slive's statement. First, it's a bit extraordinary for the SEC to openly release this kind of statement, much less put it on their website. Slive could have quietly delivered these lines in a speech, and they might have gotten picked up by the local media, but it would have been just another statement. The only reason for the SEC to make such a big production of these lines is that they wanted it to be heard.

Secondly, Slive is a lawyer. If you've ever known anyone in law school, you know that they have to learn the slightly differences between words that you and I would use interchangeably. Lawyers are extraordinarily careful about what they say. The only way to read Slive's statement is to look at like he carefully crafted every word, because odds are he carefully crafted every word. Now that all of that introduction is out of the way, let's look at the statement.

In the 78 year history of the SEC, the conference had accepted the membership applications of only two institutions -- Arkansas and South Carolina. Texas A&M is now the third. We remain optimistic that Texas A&M will be a member of the SEC and have started to look  at schedules for 2012-13 involving 13 teams.

Star-divide

We're not conference wreckers. The SEC has sparingly expanded in the last. Despite all the sound and fury you've heard over the last few days from Baylor, SEC expansion with Texas A&M is full speed ahead, and we intend to have them join the conference before next year.

As I said over the past year or so, the SEC has had no particular interest in expansion. We were, and are, happy with 12 teams. If Texas A&M’s President, Dr. Bowen Loftin had not called me in late July, we had no plans to explore adding an institution.

Texas A&M approached the SEC, not the other way around. Your case has no merit, Ken Starr, though that hasn't necessarily always stopped you.

However, when President Loftin called we became interested.  Texas A&M is an outstanding academic institution with an exceptional athletic program, passionate fans and wonderful traditions.  While the SEC wasn't thinking about expansion, it was impossible not to be interested in Texas A&M.  As you can see from the unanimous vote of our twelve Presidents/Chancellors, we would very much like to have Texas A&M as a member of our conference.

Yes, we really do want Texas A&M. We're making sure that they have their legal house in order before we make everything official, and we didn't start this whole thing, but we want A&M now that they're available. So, please, other Big 12 schools, get out of the way and don't make this messier than it has to be. And we didn't start this whole thing. Please don't sue us.

When Texas A&M joins our conference, we don't have immediate plans for a 14th member.  We aren’t thinking in terms of numbers.  We think about the strength of the SEC and the attractiveness of Texas A&M as an institution.

When Texas A&M joins out conference. That means that we're only going to allow you to hold this thing up for so long, Baylor and the other Big 12 dwarfs. You want to lawyer up and come after Mike Slive; make my day. I've got a couple billion dollars sitting around in the conference account, and I'm not afraid to use it. Oh, and all aboard that's getting aboard. The expansion train is about to leave the station.

Note the stylistic and thematic similarities between that last line and this line from the statement Bernie Machen put out after the SEC non-vote on Texas A&M that was supposed to mean the conference wasn't taking Texas A&M.

The SEC Presidents and Chancellors met today and reaffirmed our satisfaction with the present 12 institutional alignment. We recognize, however, that future conditions may make it advantageous to expand the number of institutions in the league. We discussed criteria and process associated with expansion. No action was taken with respect to any institution including Texas A&M.

It's the same thing here. Slive either is already in discussion with a 14th team or has a wish list. But that team has to come to the SEC first. Oh, and we're not starting anything with the 14th team. So please, don't sue us.

Oklahoma in the driver's seat
Whether this is some kind of feint to keep Texas from being the bad guy -- I doubt it -- or honestly how it went down, the words is that Oklahoma is now the problem. Ken Starr is now talking to lawyers in Norman.

In fact, before the Longhorns party had arrived, OU's board of regents had instructed school President David L. Boren to prepare a document to formally apply for admission to the Pac-12, a source close to the situation said.

Oh, and return of the pod people.

The ACC is willing to talk about a unique conference format that has intrigued Texas. Instead of divisions, the conference could be divided into four pods, with each pod containing four teams, to aid scheduling.

It's an idea that didn't work when the 16-team WAC tried it and won't work if a 16-team ACC tries it. It's confusing, a logistical nightmare and hurts the product on the field. Which is exactly why the ACC will probably try it.

OTHER NEWS

Will Muschamp trying to break Urban Meyer's record
BOOM! has already had seven players arrested in nine months on the job -- and we have our latest incident involving a scooter. And violently resisting arrest. This Finley guy's a keeper.

UPDATE: Finley's charge was reduced by the state attorney to misdemeanor resisting arrest without violence.

Mass confusion in the AP poll
The upshot for the SEC is that Alabama has one more first-place vote and South Carolina is really in the Top 10. The Gamecocks' win against Georgia was so impressive they moved up a day later.

Comment 12 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

"Violently resisting arrest"

The policeman grabbed Finley’s wrist, and Finley pulled it away. Real violent. I’m not saying Finley did everything right here, but the police in Gainesville have been known to overreact. This is another example.

Team Speed Kills -- SBNation's SEC Blog
If you're so inclined, follow me @Year2

by Year2 on Sep 13, 2011 7:36 AM EDT reply actions  

Culture differences

As a GA fan whose perception of law enforcement comes from UGA and Athens/Clarke Co. police, I read “scooter” and “suspended license” and think if he is on one of those death machines AND has a suspended license, how come they didn’t have him laying prostrate at gunpoint? It’s the officer’s fault for getting within arm’s reach of that mad man. I mean, he is a KNOWN SERIAL OFFENDER of having a suspended license. PLUS he owns a scooter. Obviously he is a menace to society. I’m just thankful they caught him before he started emerging from alleys. Let’s hope he can turn his life around by this wake up call.

by wnc dawg on Sep 13, 2011 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thank goodness he didn't misspell his name

They might have actually used the taser if he misspelled his middle name.

Team Speed Kills -- SBNation's SEC Blog
If you're so inclined, follow me @Year2

by Year2 on Sep 13, 2011 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Baton Rouge PD sees your overreaction

And raises you a public DNA swabbing out of the orifice of their choice.

Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook

by Billy Gomila on Sep 13, 2011 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

On pods

I expect that to be the answer for 16-team conferences. Otherwise, you’re going to play what, 2 out-of-division games a season? And in the different scenarios I’ve come up with, it works for every conference. Even assuming there are 8 16-team conferences, utilizing every current I-A team and the I-AA teams that either are in transition or have announced concrete plans to move up. 3 in-division games, 1 protected rival in each other division (at least for the SEC, and probably Big Ten Twelve Whatever), 1 additional opponent in each division per year. Division champs play semifinals before their championship game, conference champions play each other to get to the national championship game.

I’m sure that doesn’t appeal to a lot of people, but neither does going beyond 12 teams, and that’s happening too.

by commodore_dude on Sep 13, 2011 8:29 AM EDT reply actions  

Pods are the only way with 16

Otherwise you’re just gonna have 2 separate conferences within 1 conference. Either that or you don’t play every team in your division (which is just stupid).

by Mark Mandingo on Sep 13, 2011 9:34 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

And it works decently for other sports too

You either play every other team once for 15 conference games/series (like baseball), or every out-of-division team once and every in-division team twice for 18 games (like basketball).

by commodore_dude on Sep 13, 2011 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Completely disagree on pods

I’m with commodore and MM here.

The reason it was awful in the WAC is that they had anchor pods, which meant that only 2 of the 3 possible alignments ever happened. That means that none of the Utah teams could ever play any of the Colorado teams, UNLV could never play New Mexico. . . it was a mess. Avoid being idiotic and it’ll work much better.

Heel for school, Vol for life!

Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!

by Incipient_Senescence on Sep 13, 2011 11:23 AM EDT reply actions  

The WAC pretty much set the standard for what NOT to do.

But I do think mixing and matching the 4 team divisions on a regular basis would work. It’s not exactly ideal, but nothing is these days.

If you maintained the same alignment year after year then it would probably all fall apart because of all the lost rivalries, but rotating the alignment should keep people happy. You just have to make sure the divisions are pretty even competitively.

It’s one big mess, but it should work. Also, we have to remember that the old WAC’s alignment didn’t depend on TV revenue. There’s a lot more motivation on the part of SEC members to make it work so they can take advantage of the extra money.

by AllTideUp on Sep 15, 2011 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

you're wrong

about the ACC. Were they to add (just as an example) Pitt, Syracuse, West Virginia, and Rutgers (and somehow the SEC didn’t poach, again, just an example), they’d do 2 divisions:

Atlantic
FSU
Clemson
Wake
NC St
Maryland
BC
West Virginia
Syracuse

Coastal
Miami
GT
UNC
Duke
UVA
VA Tech
Rutgers
Pitt

Basically, continuing the saga of doing the absolute dumbest, most non-sensical alignment humanly possible. Even the BIG made (slightly) more sense.

by cfn_ms on Sep 13, 2011 2:19 PM EDT reply actions  

The pods work well for this too

North
BC
Syracuse
Rutgers
Pitt

Mid-North
Maryland
UVA
VT
WV

Mid-South
Duke
NC State
UNC
Wake

South
Clemson
GT
FSU
Miami

But yeah, you have exactly what they WOULD do.

by commodore_dude on Sep 13, 2011 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

c'mon, we're talking about the ACC

Atlantic
Boston College
Florida State
Virginia
Wake Forest

Coastal
Syracuse
North Carolina
Texas
Georgia Tech

East
Maryland
Virginia Tech
Duke
Texas Tech

American
Pittsburgh
NC State
Miami
Clemson

Heel for school, Vol for life!

Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!

by Incipient_Senescence on Sep 13, 2011 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the SEC

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Gator-f__custom__small
FSU/Clemson to the Big 12 Rumors: Here's the Deal
Small
14 team Basketball Schedule
4c06a6adb42798a5c08d712c620047ec_small
Why Can't This Work

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Gabalogo2_small cocknfire

Gator-f__custom__small Year2

Authors

Kleph_logo_copy_small kleph