Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Seahawks Trade for TE Kellen Winslow

Why the Latest Texas A&M to SEC Rumors Went Mainstream

Statehouse reporters are odd people. We spend our entire day trying to find out what people aren't telling us, reading between the lines of statements filled with catchphrases and quizzing people who sometimes openly disdain us in the hopes that they'll say something. And in one of the honored traditions of the craft, we throw as many questions as we can think of at the governor to see if he'll say something new.

Everyone knows Texas Gov. Rick Perry is running for president. The Texas Legislature is out of session until 2013 (really), and Perry's views on anything he'll have to deal with in the immediate future are probably known to every reporter in the Capitol. So why not ask the proud Texas A&M alumnus what he knows about these rumors that the Aggies will bolt the ramshackle Big XIIish for the SEC?

Asked by The Dallas Morning News ' statehouse reporters about SEC speculation regarding A&M, Perry responded: "I'll be real honest with you. I just read about it the same time as y'all did. ... As far as I know, conversations are being had. That's frankly all I know. I just refer you to the university and the decision makers over there."

If you were looking for the match that lit the powder keg and led to last night and this morning's frenzied outburst of reporting by the dreaded "mainstream media," Perry's statement was it. But Perry (as noted) is running for president whenever he gets around to announcing it, and so his somewhat distracted statement probably wouldn't have catapulted the story as far as it went if Texas A&M hadn't responded the way it did.

Star-divide

"President Loftin is committed to doing what is best for Texas A&M not only now, but also into the future. We continue to have wide-ranging conversations regarding all aspects of the university, including both academics and athletics."

Again, I parse statements for a living. Ladies and gentlemen, that is not just not a denial, it is a confirmation. There is no mention of the Big XIIish or how committed A&M is to the conferences survivial, no boilerplate about rumors or speculation. Instead, there is a statement about "what is best for Texas A&M" -- as opposed to other universities? -- and "wide-raning conversations regarding ... athletics." (President Loftin is welcome for the helpful edit of what he's actually saying.)

It is not a confirmation that A&M is joining the SEC tomorrow, or by Sept. 1, or whenever your favorite rumor tells you it is. It is not a confirmation that the Aggies are leaving the Big XIIish at all. But it is a confirmation that they are talking about it.

(Could they be bluffing? Only if they hoped to get a concession from Texas, whose options at this point would be to abandon the Longhorn Network -- not happening -- or sharing the revenue from the channel -- not happening. If you've heard the rumors that Texas is willing to share the LHN money with the remaining members if they stay together after A&M bolts, my guess is that it's a DeLoss Dodds offer to save political face, because he knows it won't be accepted.)

Then other people got involved. Dan Beebe, come on down. You've just wrested the title of worst conference commissioner in America back from Karl Benson (no small accomplishment).

"I'll put it this way, I'm taking it very seriously. I've been talking to a number of people. Obviously, there are a significant number of Aggie supporters who are interested in going in that (SEC) direction."

Now, let's be clear. Dan Beebe taking something seriously is not a reason for anyone else to take it seriously. This is a man who still takes the current Big XIIish seriously.

But it's still notable that the rumors have grown to such a fever pitch that Dan Beebe had to address them. And do A&M's conferencemates believe the Aggies are sticking around? No.

One high-ranking Big 12 school official said Wednesday night, "If A&M has a chance, I think they'll go for it. Loftin sure didn't stop it (rumors)."

There's also one more notable tidbit in the Austin-American Statesman's story. The Big XIIish has a contingency plan. Really, if you don't believe these words were written by someone who wasn't joking, click on the link.

The Big 12 school official told the Statesman he had heard that the Big 12, to survive in the event of A&M's departure, would consider inviting Notre Dame and Arkansas to join, but he admitted those schools were unlikely to be interested. Other possibilities, the source said, include Houston, Louisville, Brigham Young and Air Force. He saw TCU — which joins the Big East next year — as an unlikely school to approach.

If you're asking Notre Dame and Louisville to join, why the heck wouldn't you ask TCU? While you're at it, go ahead and extend invites to Michigan, Ohio State and the Delaware Blue Hens. Which is why people like Oklahoma fans are starting to get a bit jittery about their hierarchies potential willingness to go along with whatever Beebe DeLoss Dodds can MacGyver together to keep this thing going.

If you assume A&M leaves after just one year into this new agreement, what in the world would make you think some other deformed reincarnation of the same screwed up plan is suddenly going to work like magic?!?

We are probably witnessing the first stages of a dying conference. Even if Texas A&M sticks around for a few years, the damage of the last few weeks has done away with any slight chance the Big XIIish had of surviving the new, made-up TV contract they all agreed to last summer.

This blog's editorial position remains the same (at least, as far as I'm concerned -- anyone else who contributes can chime in if they disagree). The SEC is a great conference the way it is and should not expand just to expand. But if the Big XIIish is going to spin apart -- and it eventually will -- the SEC has to get Texas A&M. The stakes of losing a potential cultural fit that brings real money to the table and blows open the ironclad door keeping Texas recruits in-state are too great. If the Aggies don't belong in the Big XIIish, they belong in the SEC.

So, what are the odds A&M leaves for the SEC? I have no idea; you can put it at 30 percent or 70 percent for all I care, and I'm not going to argue with you. But the chance is very real. As one Big XIIish squirrel said when he found a nut, Texas A&M officials could have ended all this talk last night if they wanted to. They didn't.

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm surprised...

…Arkansas’ name was thrown in as a possible invite. Seems the Big 12 doesn’t understand the dynamics of what it means to be a member of the SEC. Or, maybe is it that Arkansas is not content with the SEC that I’m not aware of.

Anyways, pitching big names out there like ND has a feeling of desperation, not to mention counter to what other blogs are suggesting about UT going independent. I’m trying to comprehend why any school would want to join this conference under current conditions.

After last summer’s events, it’s getting painful to watch the Big 12 like this. Just get it over with and end it already.

by AuburnMisfit on Aug 11, 2011 11:47 AM EDT reply actions  

Arkansas is very content in the SEC

Some people miss playing Texas on a regular basis and miss the old SWC, but there’s always a few people like that. The vast majority (and all the people who count) are extremely satisfied in the SEC. I don’t think anything short of an act of God would get Arkansas to put up with being in the same conference as Texas again.

by starry on Aug 11, 2011 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Shortly after last year’s conference shuffle, ESPN’s Chris Low reported that folks at Arkansas told him they had zero interest in leaving the SEC under any circumstances. That’s good enough for me.

Team Speed Kills -- SBNation's SEC Blog
If you're so inclined, follow me @Year2

by Year2 on Aug 11, 2011 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Plus

The fact that Notre Dame preceded Arkansas on the list shows that they’re willing to toss out candidates who have absolutely no interest in joining the league.

Team Speed Kills -- SBNation's SEC Blog
If you're so inclined, follow me @Year2

by Year2 on Aug 11, 2011 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I found the listing of ND a complete joke

Someone doesn’t understand the Irish, which is a surprise in itself since they always say what they plan to or not to do in this case.

by ev on Aug 11, 2011 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Arkansas and Notre Dame are the sexy names for people in the Big-XII

With Arkansas they are inviting an old friend back in the party, with Notre Dame, a nationally prominent university. My take, the suggestion of these two is to get non-aggie Big-XII fans to dream about what could be a little bit, rather than focus on the downfall of the conference.

I support the NBA player's union.

by chowder on Aug 11, 2011 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

My Two Cents

I don’t think the Pac-12, Big Ten, or SEC want to expand right now. Larry Scott already has too much to organize getting the Pac-12 networks online and operational without having to focus on re-investigating expansion scenarios. The Big Ten also just reviewed a wide array of expansion options, and concluded that if they could not procure Notre Dame, their best option was to add one school and host a conference game. Further, if they do expand, I believe it is east rather than west.

The SEC has the most legit claim to want to expand, in order to renegotiate their television contract which has dropped in stature over the recent years, but every public statement has been how they are content with their current arrangement.

Further, with exception to Texas (which may go indy) and Texas A&M I don’t see a whole lot of schools people want. This includes Oklahoma if Oklahoma State is coupled with them. The only exception is Missouri who I feel would be a nice complimentary addition, but not a first choice.

I support the NBA player's union.

by chowder on Aug 11, 2011 1:20 PM EDT reply actions  

TexAgs' Billy Lucci (sp?)

Was just on a radio show in Baton Rouge swearing this will be a done deal inside of a month.

Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook

by Billy Gomila on Aug 11, 2011 7:04 PM EDT reply actions  

I mean maybe its just me

But he wasn’t terribly convincing.

Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook

by Billy Gomila on Aug 11, 2011 8:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why the Big 12 won't invite TCU

After the ACC raided the Big East of its best football programs, the Big East redrew their contract with significant financial penalties to stop other teams from leaving so easily. Specifically, any team that leaves has to pay $5 million to the conference and wait 27 months. TCU cannot afford to pay the $5 million penalty on their own, and the Big 12 cannot afford to wait an extra year for TCU to join, especially as TCU would not contribute substantially to Big 12 revenues. As such, adding TCU would do nothing for the Big 12.

At the moment, the best alternative for the Big 12 is BYU. They are nationally respected in football and basketball and have a nationwide fanbase. But they, along with any other plausible option, cannot make up for the loss of Texas A&M.

by Seth9 on Aug 12, 2011 10:59 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the SEC

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Gator-f__custom__small
FSU/Clemson to the Big 12 Rumors: Here's the Deal
Small
14 team Basketball Schedule
4c06a6adb42798a5c08d712c620047ec_small
Why Can't This Work

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Gabalogo2_small cocknfire

Gator-f__custom__small Year2

Authors

Kleph_logo_copy_small kleph