Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Where Do The Lakers Go From Here?

The Financials of Florida Football: Cupcakes are Big Money

Kristi Dosh runs a website called The Business of College Sports, and today on it she has posted the breakdown of Florida football's financials for the 2009 season. I encourage you to go check out the full report, because there's a lot of interesting stuff in it.

There is one element I did want to highlight: the profitability of cupcake games.

A big school like Florida sells out all of its home games, so there is little revenue difference between big conference matches and terrible non-conference blowouts. The average the school made in revenue from SEC games plus FSU was $2,456,296. The average it made from snacking on Charleston Southern, Troy, and FIU was $2,329,981.33. In fact, all of that year's home game revenue figures were in the $2.3 million range except for the rivalry games with Tennessee and FSU, which were in the $2.5 million range.

Something I've discussed here and elsewhere many times is that UF AD Jeremy Foley has adopted a strategy of trying to have seven home games per season. Because of the neutral site series with Georgia, Florida is short a conference home game every other year. Therefore, Florida can only have a single home-and-home non-conference series going on at any one time and still get seven home games. Tradition dictates that FSU will be that home-and-home, so the other three non-conference slots invariably have to be guarantee games.

The expense report has the total value of 2009's guarantees at $1.875 million. That means that the revenue from just one of those cupcake games pays for all three of the guarantees with room left to spare. The total revenue from the three body bag games was $6,989,944; the total home game expenses (including guarantees, ticket printing, officials, stadium staff, parking expenses, etc.) for the entire year was $6,502,196. That means that revenue from the entire SEC home season plus FSU was pure profit to use to cover other expenses elsewhere.

That's why Foley insists on having as many home games as possible. As Dosh points out, football revenue accounted for 86% of all revenue that came directly from sports. He probably feels that he needs to maximize football revenue as much as possible, and for good reason. UF athletics runs enough of a surplus to donate $6 million back to the university this year and $60 million since 1990. That keeps the program's goodwill high and provides a buffer for lean years. Most likely the last thing Foley wants to have happen is for the school to ask the increasingly stingy (and bizarre) Florida state legislature for more money on his account.

I encourage you to read the full post and look over all of the figures. It's a fascinating and easy to follow look at the innards of a major football program's budget.

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Wait...

but some Miami fans told me it was because Florida is afraid of them. Then some Bi east fans (yes suppoesdly they do exist) told me I had to accept that Florida was afraid to leave the south. Are you implying that these statements aren’t the case?

/Mindblown

contributing author - Alligator Army

by Cardsfan25 on Jul 13, 2011 10:53 AM EDT reply actions  

We're seeing more and more "neutral site" games as opposed to home & away deals.

Obviously those are still not as lucrative as feasting on Sunbelt teams every year, but then again maybe they are.
Take a look at the Cocktail Party numbers. $1.89MM every year. That’s $3.78 every two years, which is better than if they did a home & away where they’d only bring in $2.5MM or so over two years.
You could apply that same logic to a home & away OOC game and obviously the neutral site game is the better deal. Plus I’d have to wonder if there’s any added TV revenue for playing a big-time OOC neutral site game that the team would not get since most cupcake games are carried on ESPN-3 at best.

by TexasAUtiger on Jul 13, 2011 10:58 AM EDT reply actions  

If the Cocktail Party revenue is representative of neutral site games, then you get more revenue from two of those than a home-and-home. I don’t know if it is though.

On the one hand, it’s covered by the SEC’s existing TV rights deals. ESPN has been known to sweeten the pot to try to get teams together at neutral sites. Plus, there’s extra sponsor money (e.g. “Chick-fil-A Kickoff Classic”) in some of the non-conference neutral site games.

On the other, the stadium in Jacksonville seats more than the Georgia Dome does, and UF would have to go all the way to the JerryDome in Arlington to get a higher capacity stadium (and it won’t go that far away). All in all, I think the big neutral site games bring in more than the Cocktail Party does, but they’re more difficult to set up than home-and-home arrangements are.

Team Speed Kills -- SBNation's SEC Blog
If you're so inclined, follow me @Year2

by Year2 on Jul 13, 2011 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good point. It's not like the AD can just make a neutral site game happen every year to

replace a cupcake game. Still makes me wonder why a team would turn down a neutral site offer (as apparently AU did when offered a Chick-fil-a kickoff game against UCLA). I guess we were just “skeered” :)

by TexasAUtiger on Jul 13, 2011 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the SEC

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Gator-f__custom__small
FSU/Clemson to the Big 12 Rumors: Here's the Deal
Small
14 team Basketball Schedule
4c06a6adb42798a5c08d712c620047ec_small
Why Can't This Work

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Gabalogo2_small cocknfire

Gator-f__custom__small Year2

Authors

Kleph_logo_copy_small kleph