Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Upon Further Review: Bo Knows Longreads

NCAA's $2000 Stipend In Doubt

At the end of October, the NCAA approved an up to $2000 "stipend" for college athletes with full (not partial) scholarships. No matter how you want to spin it, it's a salary for the athletes who qualify for it.

The catch is that while the wage was approved by a committee, it can be overridden at the NCAA's annual convention if enough members schools vote to do so. It appears that's exactly what has happened:

[NCAA Division I vice president of governance David] Berst said 97 schools have signed onto the override measure, more than the 75 needed for the NCAA board to reconsider the stipend. If that number hits 125 by Dec. 26, the legislation would be suspended.

Either way, the Division I Board of Directors has three options: Rescind the stipend and operate under previous NCAA rules, modify the rule or create a new proposal that would go back to the schools for another 60-day comment period, or allow members to vote on the override. It would a take 5/8ths majority of the roughly 350 Division I members to pass.

Berst also said that somewhere in the neighborhood of 1,000 athletes signed with schools in November, and those who were promised the stipend will receive it no matter what happens at the upcoming convention. At least they got that part right.

The stipend plan has elicited a lot of criticism, but it seems that the main problems that schools are raising have to do with Title IX, added expenses, and feeling obligated to add the expenses to keep up with other programs competitively. Currently, NCAA rules allow up to 145 full (not partial) scholarships based on how many full scholarship sports a school sponsors. To give all of them the $2000 would raise expenses by $290,000 per year. That might be pocket change for the biggest football factories, but keep in mind that Division I has 350 schools in it. There are plenty of institutions potentially on the hook for some of that who are a long way off from paying millions to just the head football coach annually.

Ultimately, the problem here is that Division I is an entity where Florida, Maryland, and Texas are grouped in with Florida Gulf Coast, Maryland-Baltimore County and Texas A&M-Corpus Christi. As long as that farce continues, NCAA reform efforts are going to be seriously hampered.

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I may be completely wrong here but that added 2k isn’t going to sway a high profile player to go to UA, LSU, UF or any other higher profile school over a UAB or UT Chattanooga. The high profile schools are going to get the players they want regardless of the 2k or not. If anything, it may help smaller schools get those fringe players that the high profile schools may be reluctant to offer the stipend to because they aren’t sure if it will be worth it. If the smaller schools step up with those kids and say, we will pay the stipend it may actually work more in their favor than what people think. That is just my opinion though.

by David Story on Dec 16, 2011 12:50 AM EST reply actions  

let's face it

the big schools are going to offer the stipend to everybody they offer a scholarship (in the major revenue sports). Small schools can’t get an edge with the stipend—it’s just about keeping up

If I cared more about my UNC side, I'd call myself "Tar Volon," and that'd be awesome.
Bolts, Canes, Preds (now in different conferences!). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity
Rocky Top Talk

by Incipient_Senescence on Dec 16, 2011 7:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree

The stipend will be automatically added to the budget for all scholarship players. If anything, it further separates the big schools.

The ability to commit to multi year scholarships definitely is an area where smaller schools can get an advantage.

by Mark Mandingo on Dec 16, 2011 8:31 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

The way they wrote the rule, the choice of offering the stipend or not was to be decided on the conference level. We wouldn’t have a situation where an SEC school would be offering the stipend to some recruits but not others.

Team Speed Kills -- SBNation's SEC Blog
If you're so inclined, follow me @Year2

by Year2 on Dec 16, 2011 11:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the SEC

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Gator-f__custom__small
FSU/Clemson to the Big 12 Rumors: Here's the Deal
Small
14 team Basketball Schedule
4c06a6adb42798a5c08d712c620047ec_small
Why Can't This Work

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Gabalogo2_small cocknfire

Gator-f__custom__small Year2

Authors

Kleph_logo_copy_small kleph