ESPN Has Already Won the Conference Expansion Game
Make no mistake. All of the recent talk about conference expansion is about one thing: football TV money.
If the issue was entirely about competition, the Pac-10 would have already invited BYU in. If it was solely about academics, the Big Ten would be poised to raid the Ivy League. While the nation's two most image conscious conferences have certain thresholds to meet in those areas, the whole expansion business is about maximizing television contracts.
In that sense, ESPN (which includes ABC) has the upper hand.
Some of the expansion talk is about squeezing as much money as possible out of the regional and marginal TV networks like FSN, Versus, and Raycom. However, the conferences can shake them down only so much due to their limited reach and the fact that they don't broadcast premier games. To get the most from a television contract package, a conference must maximize its revenue from the top rate networks.
Competition to get on those top rate channels is fierce. The SEC is in the best position, as it has CBS locked down and it almost always gets the prime time spots on ESPN and ESPN2 thanks to its sweetheart deal with the Worldwide Leader. Notre Dame and NBC are in their own little world, since given NBC's problems of late, it's unlikely the Peacock would televise college football at all if it dropped the Irish's exclusive deal.
Those two realities leave the other five major conferences to fight over ABC's time slots and the rest of ESPN's. The most powerful entity in college football holds all the cards, and everyone is trying to get as attractive as possible to jockey for position at the Mouse's table. The only way that this situation changes is if Fox (the national one, not FSN) jumps in the game, but the shoddy quality of the network's BCS coverage is a fairly powerful signal that college football is not a priority there.
I don't know who will end up where when the dust settles. Because the SEC is basically locked into the largest piece of the ESPN pie for about 14 more years, I wouldn't be surprised if the other conferences do nothing now and sign contracts that expire roughly at the same time as the SEC's. That way, they could expand right before everything expires to set up a battle royale for the alpha dog contract that the SEC has now. The Big Ten especially has the ability to wait and see given the financial success of the Big Ten Network.
In fact, I'd put my money on no conference expansion at all in the next year or two. The real intrigue is going to be whether the other big conferences go for the Big Ten's regional model of creating an entire network or the SEC's model of farming the syndicated coverage to ESPN. If the four letter network gets ambitious, it could largely shut out lesser players like Raycom and Versus by offering better deals than they can.
Regardless, ESPN has already won the conference expansion game by being the only major buyer with five sellers giving their pitches.
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
The Big Eleven and Pac 10
Could get away with not expanding in 2010, but the Pac’s TV deal is up for the 2012 season… I can’t imagine they’d want to sign another deal without a conference championship game and 2 more schools. The MWC absolutely must expand to try and get AQ, and the Big East also really needs to expand. If both of these happen, and they find some way to lock in their schools against poaching from the BCS conferences, it will be very interesting. If that happens I definitely expect the Big Eleven to hold out for Notre Dame when their NBC deal runs out.
by commodore_dude on Feb 16, 2010 11:04 AM EST reply actions
Two things
The Big East will not expand because it has 16 teams for basketball. It doesn’t want any more than that.
The MWC can kiss its AQ chances goodbye if two of Utah, BYU, and TCU leave. That’s even counting if Boise State joins.
Team Speed Kills
SBNation's SEC Blog
I expect that in the next couple of years the MWC will either absorb Boise St and muscle itself into the cartel as a seventh AQ, or it will lose some if not all of its heavyweights to current ‘big 6’ conferences… and either way the current congressional interest in forcing “fairness” on the college football world via a playoff will vanish in a cloud of foul-smelling smoke, because that interest was a function of cajoling votes from the electorates of those states with heavyweight non-AQ programs.
The MWV just needs
to hold on to what they’ve got to meet the AC standards. The Pac-10 has the most to lose with a BCS eligible MWC, so they need to kneecap them quickly before they attain it.
None of the other conferences want to sit around and watch ESPN/ABC push the SEC front and center for 14 years, then try to compete for the best contract. I’ll give you a clue – it will be the team that has already laid a pretty strong claim to head and shoulders above the rest before the recruiting benefits of ESPN have even started to accrue.
Delaney will probably screw it up anyway. They’ll expand to 15 team superconference to hold a spot for Notre Dame or something.
by GwinnettGamecock on Feb 17, 2010 2:31 AM EST up reply actions
hmmm
consider the late night hour and realize I meant to say “..it will go to the conference that has already laid a pretty strong claim to being…” The cheap shot at Delaney was correct though. I feel pretty good about that.
by GwinnettGamecock on Feb 17, 2010 2:34 AM EST up reply actions
You're assuming that ESPN won't expand.
This is a network with five channels, the best online broadcasting channel and they are adding a 3D channel. If ESPN were to make ESPNU a standard tier channel (like ESPN) and end ESPN Classic (making ESPN360TV?), you could have wall-to-wall college football coverage and still have room for NASCAR on Saturdays. Imagine ESPN showing a Big Ten doubleheader with a SEC night game, ESPN2 showing a Big 12 doubleheader with a Pac-12 night game, ESPNU showing the ACC, and ABC showing regional matchups at 3pm and 8pm. Everyone would make money in buckets. This would also move games off FSN and regional cable, which increases the revenue for everyone.
Also, don’t sell NBC short. If the Comcast/Universal deal is completed, NBC will have Versus, which isn’t terrible. (NBC and Versus already are partners in NHL. Why not the Versus college packages?) It would make sense for ABC/Disney to increase the reach of ESPNU and ESPN360TV to keep the Pac-10 and Big 12 off Versus. The one thing NBC does right is live sports and it would make sense for Comcast to push sports to make money, while rebuilding NBC’s entertainment division.
The one thing that people seem to be ignoring in all of this is that the Big East could be dead in four years. The Pac-10 and Big Ten will not pick off only mid-majors. The SEC and Big 12 could make preemptive strikes. I don’t see the ACC moving, but if there are five 12 team conferences and the Big East, the Big East will lose AQ status. Unless they create a football only league with UCF, Marshall, ECU and the service academies. The Big East royally screwed up when they went to 16 for basketball and didn’t force their basketball members to build D-1 football programs.
mlmintampa
UF C/O 06
http://www.alligatorarmy.com
To get ESPNU in more homes, the Mouse would have to drop the price for it. That’s not terrible likely though.
Disney CEO Bob Iger said recently that he believes his company is not getting enough from cable and satellite companies for its content. I don’t think he mentioned ESPN specifically, but it certainly was implied. If anything, Disney will be seeking more money for its channels, not less. Same thing goes for ESPN360, which has a business model that some ISPs (Time Warner most notably) want no business in supporting regardless of price.
NBC is losing hundreds of millions on the Olympics, it’s gone through a very messy and public crisis with its late night schedule, and its prime time lineup hasn’t excited anyone since Seinfeld and Friends were on the air. Maybe Comcast ownership (provided regulators don’t block that deal) would change things, but throwing a ton of money after college football to compete with an entrenched behemoth is not fiscally responsible right now. NBC needs to get its house in order before it goes and does something as aggressive as that.
Team Speed Kills
SBNation's SEC Blog
it's in the best interest of the pac-ten to invite utah to that conference. so the mwc would not get an aq bcs conf. status.
just like kyle whittingham and troy calhoun said no to the tennessee job i hope the university says no to the desperate pac-ten. the mwc just needs to add boise, fresno and houston and then would would easily compete with the pac-ten. utah has 19 wins vs aq bcs schools. (10 vs the pac-ten including a win over usc in vegas bowl with pete carroll as coach)the last two years in football the mwc has been better than the pt. this basketball season we are better than the pt. next year the mwc will definitely be better than the pt conf. in football. i rather beat them then join them. i am biased too.
I'm all about covering the spread and moneylines. I was building a house, I don't deserve this, deserves have nothing to do with it. Bang. "Unforgiven" I drink your milkshake. I drink it up! "There Will BE Blood"
by wolfmanshowlforever on Feb 21, 2010 9:56 PM EST reply actions

by 












