Sprints Wonders When the NCAA Got a Lobotomy // 02.12.10
Here we go again
I've said it before and I'll say it again -- this is the dumbest idea that the NCAA has ever had. And that's saying something.
If passed, players who draw flags for taunting gestures on their way to a touchdown would have the penalty assessed from the spot of the foul, taking away the score. Penalties that occur in the end zone would continue to be assessed on the extra-point attempt, 2-point conversion try or ensuing kickoff.
The change would take effect in 2011 and on the NCAA's website, a release said the proposal received near-unanimous support.
"Taunting and prolonged individual acts have no place in our game, and our officials have generally handled these rules well," said former Oregon coach Mike Bellotti, the committee chair. "This is just another step in maintaining our game's image and reflecting the ideals of the NCAA overall."
First of all -- this is just another step in maintaining the game's image as seen by 50-plus-year-olds, Mr. Bellotti. You do not get to define the game for everyone else, whether you believe you do or not.
It's not that I want taunting in the game. It's that I don't think you have to destroy the emotions of the game in order to save it. Taunting as a dead-ball foul is fine with me and probably good for the game. Taunting as a live-ball foul is taking something that injures no one and gives no one a competitive advantage in the game -- different that any other live-ball penalty in the game -- and can take points off the board. Am I the only one that sees that as a bit much?
Well, at least a questionable unsportsmanlike conduct call has never affected the outcome of a game or any--
Last season's big controversy stemmed from Georgia receiver A.J. Green receiving a 15-year personal foul penalty after he caught a go-ahead touchdown pass late in a game against LSU. The yardage from the penalty was assessed on the ensuing kickoff and helped LSU get into position to drive for the winning score. The Southeastern Conference would later say there was no video evidence to support the flag on Green.
Oh, right.
This should go well.
A shake-up at Vanderbilt?
Those of you who wondered why Ted Cain was an offensive coordinator at any SEC school -- wonder no more.
Jimmy Kiser has been elevated from quarterbacks coach to Vanderbilt's offensive coordinator as part of a shakeup of duties among the offensive staff, Commodores football Coach Bobby Johnson announced today.
Cain will now be special teams coordinator.
Given the quarterbacks in the last several years at Vanderbilt, one can question the move, but there you have it.
Vanderbilt Sports Line is not impressed
And that's putting it mildly.
I would only note that last season Kiser was responsible for the play-calling. ... Pleased with the play-calling? Really?
Some might say this is nothing more than reorganizing the deck chairs on the Titanic.
Some might say.
Not so fast, my friend
Teryl Austin is not technically Florida's co-defensive coordinator yet. Wink.
Despite all signs pointing to Arizona Cardinals defensive backs coach Teryl Austin becoming Florida's next defensive coordinator, Florida spokesmen on Thursday said nothing is official and the school has no press release planned.
Which is usually what they say right before an announcement is made.
Personality clash?
Alligator Army wonders if there could be some issues with the co-coordinator idea.
These coaches are professionals, but we already saw internal politics send Billy Gonzales to LSU, so don't think these guys can't get jealous or upset. Heater, if he wants to be sole coordinator, can point to 30 years experience in college football. But Austin offers things Heater does not have; young guy, NFL experience and two Super Bowl appearances.
Or they could realize that arguing like that is probably not the best way to win football games. Just saying.
Record sales for Ole Miss baseball tickets
You can almost hear the "ping" right now.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Oh dear.
I can’t believe this asinine rule is actually coming to pass.
You have to love Belloti’s comment about how well the officials have handled this rule. Right. They’ve only, you know, totally changed the outcomes of a few games. No biggie.
Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.
For the record
This
Last season’s big controversy stemmed from Georgia receiver A.J. Green receiving a 15-year personal foul penalty after he caught a go-ahead touchdown pass late in a game against LSU. The yardage from the penalty was assessed on the ensuing kickoff and helped LSU get into position to drive for the winning score. The Southeastern Conference would later say there was no video evidence to support the flag on Green.
Was followed up by an equally nonsensical penalty on Charles Scott that Georgia was unable to capitalize on.
Dude
Get over it. LSU won that game fair and square. That’s not what this is about. Georgia fans aren’t blaming the refs for losing that game. We blame the terrible kick-off coverage and the inability to properly tackle a running back (not coincidentally the two coaches in charge of those departments were fired at the end of the season).
What irks most Georgia fans is that we feel ever since the “dancefest” in the 2007 Cocktail Party is that it seems like the SEC refs felt like they were embarassed and have decided to scrutinize those types of judgment calls on Georgia a little harsher than any of the other teams in the conference.
The AJ Green reference gets brought up because it was a pretty egregious call wherein the conference basically apologized and said there was no basis for the flag. This new rule asks too much of the referees who already have a difficult enough time distinguishing between what is truly taunting/bringing excessive attention to oneself and what is a natural release of emotion from an extremely emotional group of 18-22 year olds. That’s the issue. We’re not talking about Georgia getting screwed or LSU not deserving that win. We’re talking about the NCAA trying to create robots out of kids that can’t logically operate in that manner. So I say again. Get over it.
http://hobnailboot.wordpress.com/
Yeah, BUT
Half the story is the only half that ever gets brought up.
by Billy Gomila on Feb 12, 2010 1:31 PM EST up reply actions
Irony
TSK brings up the Green penalty as such:
Well, at least a questionable unsportsmanlike conduct call has never affected the outcome of a game or any—
…yet you’re telling LSU fans to get over it? Geez, man. TSK brought it up, and said explictly that it affected the outcome of the game, completely ignoring that there was a makeup call a good 30 seconds later. Bringing up the Green call without mentioning the Scott call while claiming the game was adversely affected by the poor call is inherently misleading.
YOU get over it. We sleep pretty easily at night over the calls in that game.
Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com
The Green penalty affected the outcome of the game because it gave LSU good field position before a touchdown
The Scott penalty did not because Georgia didn’t score afterward. Something doesn’t affect the outcome of the game by merely existing.
Team Speed Kills. All SEC, all the time.
Utterly Ridiculous!
I can’t believe they are considering this!
What you're seeing is team spirit. It's like the Holy Spirit, but more powerful.
-Hank Hill
Rebel fans
are the ultimate gluttons for punishment. Host a regional, choke, repeat….
by Go Hide in the V-berth on Feb 12, 2010 3:43 PM EST reply actions
What disturbs me most about this is
not so much the dumb play where a guy is showing off on his way to the end zone. It’s when a player leaps into the end zone thinking he might get tackled, and the ref thinks it was unnecessary, and flags him, he will get flagged 15 yards and it will be first down from the 16 or 17?
And it WILL happen!
Gregatron is not responsible for any of the crap he just wrote.
St. Louis vegetarian blog

by 













