The 4-Stack Formation and Who Should Run It
by Year2 on Apr 7, 2009 3:06 PM EDT
in Football
7 comments
I am a connoisseur of innovations in offense, and I'm always interested in learning about new things. I'm not so big on things that require loopholes to work, but if it's within both the letter and spirit of the rulebook, let 'er rip, I say.
As a result, I am a regular reader of the blog Smart Football. If it's not in your RSS collection by now, it should be.
Recently, Chris (who runs the site) did a feature article on the offense that Mississippi Valley State ran when Jerry Rice was there. The piece was apparently inspired by an old Seattle P-I article on the topic, but Chris highlights and fleshes out the formation that MVSU Head Coach Archie Cooley called the 4-Stack.
Original image by Chris of Smart Football.
The 4-Stack worked on the principle that no one in I-AA could cover Jerry Rice, and that was certainly true. The Delta Devils would isolate him on one side and have four receivers run confusing routes on the other.
If the defense doubled or tripled up on Rice, the offense would have an advantage on the other side. If they single-covered Rice, he'd burn his man for a big gain and maybe even a touchdown.
The evolution of defense and all-around quality of players in I-A prevents anyone from using this formation extensively. There simply aren't many players that present the same kind of mismatch as Rice was to the I-AA defenders.
Still, it looks like a lot of fun. I'd like to see some SEC teams pull this out once or twice against cupcakes and maybe even the right in-conference foe. Here are my picks.
ALABAMA
It seems like few of the super hyped recruits each year actually come in and make immediate impacts. Julio Jones lived up to his hype though, hauling in 58 balls (the next-highest receiver had 16 catches) and being a general menace to defenses.
At 6'4", 210 lbs he's a mismatch for your standard 5'9" or 5'10" corner and can operate well in space. The guy is the real deal and could make this become known as the "Julio Jones formation" to those who don't know its origin.
One problem though: who are the other four guys you're putting out there? The second-highest receiver for Bama was TE Nick Walker, and tied for third was RB Glen Coffee. I guess you can put Colin Peek and Mark Ingram in there, but I have doubts about how good the other guys they can line up would be at making the defense pay for doubling Jones.
GEORGIA
For all the attention on Jones, he wasn't even the leading freshman receiver in the conference. Georgia's A.J. Green caught two fewer balls but went for more yards than his counterpart in Tuscaloosa. Green was the playmaking receiver that Georgia has largely lacked in recent years, and he helped Matthew Stafford get his completion percentage above 60% for the first time in his career in 2008.
Like Jones, Green is listed at 6'4" and towers over most corners. He is about as sure handed as they come, and he could cause some real damage out of this set.
Georgia does have a similar problem to Alabama though when it comes to filling out the other four guys. Their landscape at receiver isn't quite as barren as Bama's is, but losing senior Mohammed Massaquoi hurts. Incoming freshman Marlon Brown may help if he's as good as Rivals and Scout say he is, but UGA is also probably looking at including a tight end or running back in the formation.
FLORIDA
This would have been a great Percy Harvin formation, and for all of Urban Meyer's encyclopedia knowledge of football, I'm kind of surprised they never tried it even once. Anyway, my pick for the lone man is a bit outside the box, but it's TE Aaron Hernandez.
Meyer has said a couple times this spring that the Gators' two biggest matchup problems according to opposing coaches were Harvin and Hernandez. At 6'3", 255 lbs he is too big for defensive backs to cover, but he's too fast for linebackers to cover. He's tough to bring down in the open field and would be a terror in the space this formation provides.
He was Florida's third-leading receiver last season, and the top two guys are gone now. He's been building great rapport with Tim Tebow this spring and at times looks like the best player on the field. With Florida's seemingly endless supply of receivers and speed backs to make a serious threat on the stack side, why not give it a try?
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Email
Print
Comments
"Hernandez with space..."
That would be the most fearsome thing to hear in the SEC if we used this formation. The only problem I see: with the “endless supply of receivers and speed backs,” are we sure that they wouldn’t get tangled up? It seems like this would have worked perfectly with Spurrier if he ever got a dominant receiver, because the timing routes would’ve been a great second option after looking over to the lone man. If a team has the combination of the one super receiver and several other receivers who are disciplined enough to run the proper routs, then this formation would supplant the Wildcat as the steamrolling “gadget” play.
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Apr 7, 2009 3:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Two guys head up field, one goes short to intermediate, and the fourth is the safety valve. They’ll be bunched initially as they take off, but that’s kind of the point since they’re supposed to confuse the defense on that side. Once they get going, especially with the speed that the guys going long would have, it would take long to get the knot untied.
by Year2 on Apr 7, 2009 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Assuming the last sentence was supposed to be "wouldn't take long":
I guess I was dreaming of all of those receivers running complicated routes.
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Apr 7, 2009 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's less "getting tangled up"
and more pressing the WRs at the LOS. One defender who can stone a guy at the line could disrupt the timing of all 4 routes because of the stack or bunch look. I could see this working a lot better in the 80s when there was minimal press coverage in college.
by DoubleB on Apr 7, 2009 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eh
Pressing guys at the line hasn’t stopped teams from running timing routes. Perhaps last year’s most memorable play, the Harrell-to-Crabtree throw that beat Texas, was a timing route.
It just has to be done by a team with five good receivers. If you line up a tight end or running back out there, then the defense can (and probably will) put a linebacker on him and somewhat negate the advantage. That’s why I’m not so convinced Alabama or Georgia could pull this off, even though Jones and Green are good enough to justify giving it a try.
But this issue is also why I suggested trying it against a cupcake team. It’s not ever going to be a staple of a regular SEC offense.
by Year2 on Apr 8, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's risk-reward
If the offense is in a regular formation, and I press a guy 1-on-1 at the line and I get beat, then I and the defense are in deep trouble. Even with over the top help that guy is quickly wide open.
If I press a guy in a bunch formation I can a) potentially blow up ALL the routes in the bunch and b) even I don’t touch anyone, there’s still a zone (albeit not as effective) behind me.
Regarding Harrell to Crabtree, Texas was playing man under, 2-deep coverage (at least on the field side). The DB doesn’t get his hands on Crabtree (looks like he didn’t even try) and runs trail technique.
by DoubleB on Apr 8, 2009 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
