Breaking: SEC and ACC to Swap UK, Vandy for Clemson, FSU
If you thought the days of conference realignment were over after the ACC’s raid of the Big East a few years back, think again.
I have learned from a source close to league offices that the SEC and ACC have reached a preliminary agreement to do the unprecedented: exchange member schools. Kentucky and Vanderbilt will be going to the ACC’s Atlantic Division, while Clemson and Florida State will join the SEC East.
On the surface, it makes sense.
Clemson and Florida State are football schools and will fit right in with the SEC’s culture. Adding them in place of two of the conference’s weaker football programs helps ensure the SEC’s status as the top league for the sport. Those two also now unite with in-state rivals South Carolina and Florida, which allows all four of them more flexibility in non-conference scheduling.
As an added bonus, Clemson and FSU are closer to the other member schools than the comparatively remote Vandy and Kentucky. That could help both the 10 existing members and the two new ones save on travel costs, a big plus in the current economic environment.
The ACC is reportedly interested in Vanderbilt for its academics and proximity to the large Nashville metropolitan area. Adding Kentucky gives the conference another power with which to battle the Big East for basketball supremacy.
There has been no decision finalized yet on whether the SEC will try to renegotiate its contract with ESPN as a result of the move. Right now it appears the conference will wait until the economy improves to ask for more money, though that could change in the coming weeks.
As college sports become more and more of a business, I wouldn’t be surprised to see other moves taking place. Off the top of my head, I’d say Boston College going back to the Big East with South Florida going to the ACC at the very least makes sense geographically.
Obviously this is big news and we won’t know the full ramifications for years. It will be fascinating to monitor the situation over the next few weeks as more details emerge.
0 recs |
8 comments
|
Comments
Hahaha!
It would be awesome though, and would free up another out-of-conference game for UF, maybe even allow the Gators to travel outside of Dixie for once.
by falcontom on Apr 1, 2009 9:46 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
oh, I get it
Ha! For a second I got my hopes up, and then i saw the date.
by doker on Apr 1, 2009 10:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You funny.
But that’d lower our level of competition.
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Apr 1, 2009 6:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Funny.
But serioously, I love thinking about conference realignment. It’d be fun to expand to a huge number (16 teams?) just to be a true SEC.
by ejruiz on Apr 1, 2009 8:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure about that
Ask the WAC how 16-team conferences turn out.
Personally, I’m happy with 12.
Team Speed Kills. All SEC, all the time.
by cocknfire on Apr 1, 2009 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder how a 16-team conference would work in football… almost certainly you’d have to play the rest of the division every year, but would you be limited to a fixed rival in the other division? (Somewhat boring – and that’s seven teams you never play unless it’s the title game; that’s hardly like being in the same conference.) Or a rotating opponent? (You see everybody – eventually – but it would muck up a lot of great rivalries.) Or a fixed rival and a rotating? (Perhaps the best compromise, but – like the Pac-10 – you’d be sacrificing an OOC game every year, likely against a decent opponent; you’re already locked into at least four away games – five in alternating years, though we might balance the schedule by making the fixed rivalries all neutral site – and nine against big-conference opposition.)
On balance, I think 12 is the largest a football conference really ought to go; 16 is fine for basketball with its thirty-game schedule, but the football season doesn’t seem long enough to make it work.
by peachy rex on Apr 2, 2009 3:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What the WAC did, and I'm not making this up
They had four sets of four teams each. Two of the sets served as "anchors," if you will, for a pair of divisions. The other two sets — and again, this is dead serious — rotated between the divisions. One of the latter two sets was in a division for two years, and then it would rotate to the other. (The arrangement only lasted for three years, and I imagine that was a key reason.)
In theory, a 16-team conference with some of the other area teams who are really good looks nice. It’s just unworkable.
Team Speed Kills. All SEC, all the time.
by cocknfire on Apr 2, 2009 3:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Come on!
You had me pissed off for a second.
http://anythingbutgatorade.blogspot.com - yet another SEC sports blog
by Anything but Gatorade on Apr 2, 2009 9:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 











