Outback Bowl Hates SEC East, American Values -- But Loves Auburn
UPDATE: The Game Formerly Known as the Peach Bowl will go with Tennessee vs. Virginia Tech.
And now, playing the in the Outback Bowl after going 2-5 in the two months of the season with wins against Furman and Ole Miss and losses to Kentucky AT HOME and Georgia and Arkansas on the road ...
The Outback Bowl has invited Auburn to its Jan. 1 game and will make the official announcement later today, according to a person familiar with the process. Auburn's Big 10 opponent is expected to be Wisconsin, although it's not clear if that will be announced today. ...
Auburn is the first SEC West team selected since Alabama beat Michigan 17-14 on Jan. 1, 1997, in Gene Stalling's final game as the Tide's head coach.
While this is a surprise to rational people, it really shouldn't be given the Outback Bowl's history of bizarre bowl choice. Last year, the game selected 7-5 South Carolina pretty much out of necessity, though it could have gotten a better LSU team instead. The Gamecocks got waxed playing an Iowa team that they probably shouldn't have been facing.
Now the Tampa-based bowl has taken the 7-5 SEC team least likely and some would say least qualified for the bowl. The Outback, generally considered a bowl for an SEC East squad, had to pass over Georgia, Tennessee and Kentucky to select the Tigers. And if you're going to ignore late-season losing streaks, why not at least invite a team in South Carolina that defeated its hate rival?Vols fans are most unhappy, since Tampa seemed the best destination for Tennessee.
When you have six teams at 7-5, it's not going to be totally fair. It's tough to argue Auburn/Tennessee, because the Tigers beat the Vols. It's not tough to argue that of the six 7-5 teams, Tennessee has the best credentials. What's more, not only did the Outback Bowl go away from their traditional agreement of picking an SEC East team, they've reportedly rejected 8-4 Ole Miss, as the Cotton Bowl's attempted trade of Tennessee for Ole Miss was shot down by the suits in Tampa.
But Tennessee isn't the only team that might get cheated. By rejecting the Vols and every other team in the East, most of those programs will drop at least one bowl. Except perhaps Georgia, which could still get a shot at the Game Formerly Known as the Peach Bowl because of ticket sales.
We now pretty much know all of this:
BCS: Alabama
BCS: Florida
Capital One: LSU
Cotton: Ole Miss
Outback: Auburn
What's left?
Game Formerly Known as the Peach Bowl
Music City
Liberty
Independence
Papajohns.com
The Peach Bowl -- no, I'm not going to call it by the corporate name -- now gets a chance to throw a curve ball by choosing the Vols or someone else. And if reports are to be believed, that is precisely what they will do.
Sources indicated on Monday that the Vols wouldn't slide past the Atlanta-based bowl if the Outback didn't take them, though no decision has been reached yet according to UT athletic director Mike Hamilton.
UPDATED: The News-Sentinel now reports that Tennessee will go to Atlanta.
Tennessee and Virginia Tech will meet in the Chick-fil-A Bowl, according to a source familiar with the selection process.
An official announcement should come after the SEC releases non-BCS teams for bowl consideration, possibly later this evening. The Vols still don't have an official bid either verbally or in writing at this point according to a separate source in the UT athletic program, but that appears to be a formality.
The Music City, meanwhile, loves to choose Kentucky when they get the chance because of proximity and fan excitement to be going to any bowl not held in towns whose populations double on bowl day.
There is a chance that Georgia or even South Carolina could still get into one of these bowls. The Dawgs could still be in line to play Clemson in the Peach if the Tigers don't win the ACC Championship Game and South Carolina would make an intriguing opponent for North Carolina if the Tar Heels end up going to Nashville. The league could also intervene, since the bowl rules for the Music City and the Liberty state that the two "will make their selections, not in any specific order, but in consultation with the SEC Office."
Barring involvement by Mike Slive and Co., though, it's likely that Arkansas, Georgia and South Carolina will be left fighting for the last three spots. I can't imagine the Liberty passing up a chance to take the Dawgs, and the Independence's best draw would probably be Arkansas. That leaves South Carolina looking at a trip to Birmingham for the Papajohns.com Bowl.
Few of those destinations seem terribly fair. But that was apparently the last thing on the mind of the Outback Bowl when it chose to go with Auburn.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Besides the Auburn-Tennessee head-to-head...
Maybe Auburn’s moral victories outweigh Kiffin’s moral victories.
by falcontom on Dec 1, 2009 4:59 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
the real reason
Word in Bham is that AU AD Jay Jacobs guaranteed an absurd number of ticket sales to Outback (with AU eating the inevitable difference) so that there would be no chance that Chizik could end up facing his old school in the Indy Bowl.
Correct me if I'm wrong...
…but isn’t Iowa St. a virtual lock for Shreveport from the Big XII side of things? I’ve heard talk of A&M here, but I can’t imagine them getting ousted from the Texas Bowl in favor of the Cyclones. That’d just be financial suicide, quite frankly. So it seems that whichever SEC team that just found its stride late gets selected is basically going to have a home game.
And is it just me, or is Auburn vs. Wisconsin not an intriguing match-up at all?
It's not
They’ve played in bowl games at least once or twice that I can remember in recent years.
Team Speed Kills. All SEC, all the time.
It seemed to be either that or Tennessee-Wisconsin, which has also happened quite recently.
’07 in the Outback, even.
Either way, totally uninteresting. And I blame Wisky.
Doesn't loving Auburn, by definition . . .
. . . mean hating American values? (I hate Auburn.)
Seriously, it is time for the SEC to ditch these clowns in the Outback Bowl. They’re forever pulling this kind of nonsense, dating at least as far back as when they took a clearly undeserving Kentucky team because of the CEO’s connection to Lexington.
Absurd.
Go 'Dawgs!
No class.
But I’m not surprised.
"We're at AUBURN. I think that says it all. We're going after the best in the country -- no matter when, what, where, how. That's how we're going to do it. We're going to work really hard to try to get that done every year -- including this one." -- Auburn University Head Football Coach Gene Chizik
Hogs going to the Liberty Bowl
Looking way more likely than Georgia at this point: http://www2.nwanews.com/blogs/slophouse/2009/12/01/awaiting-bowl-bids-mallett-makes-manning-award-cut/
can't...stop...posting
http://www2.nwanews.com/blogs/slophouse/2009/12/01/give-me-liberty-or-give-me-liberty/
I really should get my own blog or something.
OK, wait...
…something that doesn’t make sense to me here…
The article above says that the Cotton couldn’t take Tennessee because the Outback folks blocked it. But the two bowls pick simultaneously, right? OB obviously didn’t want Ole Miss or Tennessee otherwise they’d have taken the East for West trade. But if they’re picking Auburn anyway, why can’t the Cotton simply turn around and take Tennessee? None of the non-BCS bowls can technically offer a spot to anyone until the BCS selections are officially done, right? So why can’t the Cotton pull one over on the Outback?
Just a thought and one which I do not think will alter Georgia’s destination (ultimately, the only team I give a rip about). And, I think T. Kyle nailed it: this is a perfect scenario for Richt to motivate the team going forward. 7-4 gets you Shreveport. You don’t want to go to Shreveport? Don’t go 7-4.
HBTD
It's not that complicated:
The Cotton had first pick of the SEC West after the Cap One and CHOSE Ole’ Miss because they had 8 wins. That left the Outback to choose between six different teams with seven wins each. One team was gonna be happy, five mad. To learn how all this works, Google “SEC bowl tie-ins” and all will be revealed.
Bowl committees want teams that will field an interesting team to keep TV audiences tuned in, fill local hotel rooms and fill the stadium. The Outback committee had their choice of six equivalent teams. They chose Auburn. Why?
This highest attendance ever at the Outback? Auburn in 1990. Auburn’s other appearance there in ’96 was also in the top 5 in all time attendance for that bowl, despite the weather being a driving rainstorm all day.
Maybe some day the fans of UT, UGA and other grumblers will support their teams as well as Auburn fans support the Tigers and those teams, too, can get selected for one of the better bowls.
In the meantime, enjoy Shreveport. Just remember to check the bedsheets. That place has hosted Bammers for untold years in the recent past and the sanitation probably ain’t the best.

by 













