Urban Meyer Fined for Ref Comments
by Year2 on Nov 6, 2009 1:45 PM EST
in SEC Football
Email
PrintUrban Meyer got a $30,000 fine for criticizing officials after last week's Florida-Georgia game. Mike Slive issued a terse statement about which clause of the ethics code Meyer violated, and the coach responded with an apologetic form letter saying he's sorry and accepts the fine.
This is the first case of someone getting punishment under the SEC's new policy which allows the conference to fine or suspend on first offense of criticizing officials instead of having to go through a pair of reprimand letters first. The key word there is "fine or suspend," which some folks seemed to have missed given some of the comments I've seen throughout the week. First time offenders were never going to get held out of a game by Slive, who decided to go the symbolic fine route instead.
In fact, I'd be surprised if anyone gets a suspension until the third strike, in which case the reprimand letters simply will have been replaced by pocket change shakedowns for the conference's millionaire coaches. If you're wondering why the announcement took so long to come out, it's because Slive was out of the office traveling most of the week.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
30k is pretty steep for this kind of penny-ante complaint – for it to be proportionate, the league will have come down like a ton of bricks on the next coach to say something serious.
Kiffen’s the only one who’s really said anything “serious”, and even then, I think part of his comments were taken out of context. Both Petrino and Mullins said similar things for their reprimands, with Mullins taking it just a bit further by suggesting the replay official should be punished.
Ed Orgeron‘s "Seems like some people get the calls and some people don’t… There were very questionable calls throughout the season and it seems they go for the better team" was pretty bad too.
Team Speed Kills
SBNation's SEC Blog
You're right
The two statements are not comparable. Nick Williams did, in fact, hit Tim Tebow late. It wasn’t vicious or intended to cause injury, it wasn’t on his blind side or helmet-to-helmet, and it only barely qualified as a “cheap shot,” but it was late and it should have been flagged under the rules of the game. Urban Meyer simply said so.
That’s a far cry from the Tennessee coaches’ very strong insinuations that SEC officials aren’t impartial. Those statements tiptoe very close to the edge of openly questioning the integrity of the league’s officiating. As with the reprimand against Bobby Petrino, Urban Meyer shouldn’t be fined merely for stating the rules accurately.
Go 'Dawgs!
It seems we're mired in inconsistency at this point.
Orgeron’s comment didn’t bring a reprimand to either himself or Kiffin. Bobby Johnson’s comment, which was suspiciously close to Meyer’s, didn’t draw a reprimand. Petrino started it all by stating on his TV show that “there were probably 3 calls that influenced the game”. The problem seems to be with Bylaw 10.5.4 itself. The language “refrain from public criticism of officials” apparently means that you can’t state (or even imply) that an official blew a call. Under this definition, Orgeron’s comments aren’t a violation (and thus no reprimand), especially if you look at the full transcript. Under this same definition, Petrino, Meyer, Johnson, Kiffin, and Mullins are all guilty of a violation, as they all stated (or implied) that refs blew calls, with some of them going as far to single out individual officials.
So what's the distinction
between Orgeron’s statements and the others? I’m honestly missing it here. Isn’t he implying that the refs are biased? How is that not “criticism?”
I think we actually agree on this...
but you missed the point I was trying to make. My point was the Petrino, Johnson, and Meyer got 3 different penalties for basically the same offense, while Orgeron got nothing, simply because he was so vague that you can’t really call it “criticism of an official”, because he didn’t identify a specific play, blown call, or official. That was the “inconsistency” I was referring to.
They just used him
to make an example out of him, now all the SEC coaches know league isnt messing around.
I don't think I can remember
a season as focused on off-the-field crap as this one.
This is the final, absurdist touch.
I think the absurdist capper is still coming.
I see this (and the SEC’s behavior in general) as the escalating nationalism and colonialism, to which the only recourse will be outright dadaism. I think Houston Nutt has been way ahead of the curve, here.
by Giant Catfish on Nov 6, 2009 11:06 PM EST up reply actions
Louisiana Tech being ever so gracious to give this game to BSU.
I can’t believe they punted. What an idiotic call. A lobotomized monkey could see the BSU touchdown coming.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on Team Speed Kills
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
