Mt. Cody Saves the Day: Alabama 12, Tennessee 10
Join the Weekend Open Thread
Now they're even. A week after Florida just avoided an upset against Arkansas at home, it was Alabama's turn to nearly lose a game against a supposedly inferior foe.
It was not a thing of beauty for Alabama. Two blocked FGs by Terrence Cody were only the most obvious examples of the defense bailing out the offense. Even Mark Ingram ended up fumbling the very carry that put him one yard shy of 100 for the day -- a turnover that ended up giving the Volunteers their only TD. That was one more than the Tide had, in part because of an effective defense by Monte Kiffin and an anemic passing attack from Alabama, the latest in a string of subpar days by Greg McElroy. No matter the final result, this was not a great day for the Tide.
Alabama did get Julio Jones involved in the game plan, but to no real effect. He had seven catches for 54 yards and couldn't come up with a TD catch on two consecutive tries in the first half.
Tennessee actually outgained Alabama by 85 yards. Jonathan Crompton was not great, but he was good enough to put the Vols in a position to win, going 21-of-36 on the day for 265 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT. The rushing attack was practically shut down and Tennessee almost won anyway -- as much as you can really expect from a QB when the winning FG is essentially blocked twice.
I don't know whether to give the officials credit for a no-call at the end of the game. Cody, having blocked the FG, ran down the field and took off his helmet before the ball was downed. That's a penalty according to the rule book, but Cody probably wasn't listening for the whistle and was too far ahead of the play to realize that the ball was still live. So do we applaud the officials for showing more restraint than the crew for the LSU-Georgia game? Or do we question why Tennessee wasn't allowed to try the winning FG again, this time 15 yards closer?
The near-loss will take some of the hype out of Bama's campaign to be No. 1 and Mark Ingram's bid for the Heism@n. Neither case was fatally wounded, but both came out of the game in worse shape than they were in when the day began. Not only did Ingram fumble the ball on that critical drive, Alabama defeated Tennessee by less than Florida in a game that was far closer than the contest in Gainesville.
But it was a win, and as long as Alabama makes it to Atlanta, that's all that really matters.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Cody saved the day!
We outplayed you every way except kickers. Congratulations, Tide Fans!
Rules are rules.
If it’s in the rule book, it should be called. Terrence Cody should show more composure, because he came very close to winning, and then losing, the game. That being said, it doesn’t surprise me that it wasn’t called, nor do I think that the officials had any questionable intentions by not calling it.
Glad it wasn't called.
Let the kids celebrate, you know? He thought the game was over, and in all seriousness it was.
Tennessee Fans: We win at teh Internet!
by bobo_the_vol on Oct 24, 2009 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions
It doesn't matter
I’ll let Andy Staples give the explanation:
Even if officials had flagged Cody, Tennessee wouldn’t have gotten another kick.
Because Alabama blocked and recovered the ball, Alabama had possession. The game can’t end on a defensive penalty, but because of the possession change, Alabama wasn’t on defense. We’ll let SEC spokesman Charles Bloom take it from here.
“The foul for taking helmet off is a live ball foul treated as a dead-ball foul,” Bloom wrote in an e-mail Saturday night. “That is, if it happens on a play where time does not expire then the penalty is enforced on the following play. However since the clock ran out on that play, then there is no next play, so there is no penalty to mark off.”
Team Speed Kills
SBNation's SEC Blog
Considering that the penalty is treated as a dead-ball foul, this is true. Point taken. But that’s the only reason. If the penalty was “live-ball” enforced, would it matter that Alabama recovered the ball? For “roughing the kicker” during a punt, the kicking team gets the ball back; it’s not assessed as “negative yardage” for the receiving team. I’m not sure if this is similar, though.
If the foul is treated as a live ball foul (like your example of roughing the kicker is), then no, it doesn’t matter that Alabama recovered it. Tennessee would have gotten another chance at the kick from 15 yards closer.
Team Speed Kills
SBNation's SEC Blog
Negative Nancy strikes back.
We beat Tennessee.
We have a week off.
Auburn is losing.
RMFT
Lee Corso: How would you describe tailgating at Alabama?
Kirk Herbstreit: Barbecue and Ralph Lauren

by 










